X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 02:17:20 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-ia0-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0c2) with ESMTPS id 5844477 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 23:25:02 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.210.180; envelope-from=donkarich@gmail.com Received: by mail-ia0-f180.google.com with SMTP id f6so2377807iag.25 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:24:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.140.106 with SMTP id rf10mr3999062igb.48.1351308267339; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.100.201 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.43.100.201 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:24:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: X-Original-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:24:27 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: New Legacy Project From: Don Karich X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f923b0641bf6004cd01f92d --e89a8f923b0641bf6004cd01f92d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I meant that at empty wt CG is several inches forward of the leading edge of wing. At minimal loading (ie: minimal fuel, passengers, flight bag.headsets),i am at forward CG limit. On Oct 26, 2012 11:17 PM, "Don Karich" wrote: > Kevin, I can only speak for my experience. My goal was to keep it as light > as possible and as forward CG as possible thereby giving me the greatest > payload as possible without leaving the envelope. To do so i have two b+c > batterys(dual electrical systems) on the firewall(eliminates a lot of heavy > wire), no floorboards. I have empty wt under 1500 and > several inches forward of leading edge. With 2 people, Minimal fuel and > flight bag, CG is on forward limit. Plane Flys very well, almost impossible > to overload .only downside i can find is that i believe that I'm told if CG > is further aft speed is greater. > On Oct 26, 2012 7:47 PM, "Kevin Stallard" wrote: > >> Weight is everything. Especially at our high altitude on hot summer >> days. I recommend you weigh your options by giving considerable weight to >> your weight. :) >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of >> James Seilbach >> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 5:48 AM >> To: lml@lancaironline.net >> Subject: [LML] New Legacy Project >> >> Hello, >> >> I am starting a new Legacy Project in January with 2 weeks of builder >> assistance in Oregon. I will be building it a KFNL in Colorado. I am >> trying to decide which options to build into my project and have been >> exhaustively scouring the internet looking for ideas/suggestions. I have >> learned a lot from searching through the archives of this list, Thank you! >> >> One option I am considering is AC, and it looks like N33RH had a pretty >> interesting AC installation with a duct on the bottom of the aircraft. I >> haven't been able to find out where it came from. I believe the aircraft >> was built by Rich Henning, and I found a website with some information on >> it (http://www.lancairlegacy.com/RHGroup.html), but the contact info, >> email and phone number, are out of date. I spoke with Lancair and they do >> not have any updated contact information for him either. Does anyone have >> current contact information for Rich, possibly he is still subscribed to >> this list? >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> James Seilbach >> james@seilbach.com >> 970-691-9305 >> >> >> >> -- >> For archives and unsub >> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html >> >> -- >> For archives and unsub >> http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html >> > --e89a8f923b0641bf6004cd01f92d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I meant that at empty wt CG is several inches forward of the leading edg= e of wing. At minimal loading (ie: minimal fuel, passengers, flight bag.hea= dsets),i am at forward CG limit.

On Oct 26, 2012 11:17 PM, "Don Karich"= <donkarich@gmail.com> wro= te:

Kevin, I can only speak for my experience. My goal was to keep it as lig= ht as possible and as forward CG as possible thereby giving me the greatest= payload as possible without leaving the envelope. To do so i have two b+c = batterys(dual electrical systems) on the firewall(eliminates a lot of heavy= wire), no floorboards. I have empty wt under 1500 and several inches forward of leading edge. With 2= people, Minimal fuel and flight bag, CG is on forward limit. Plane Flys ve= ry well, almost impossible to overload .only downside i can find is that i = believe that I'm told if CG is further aft speed is greater.

On Oct 26, 2012 7:47 PM, "Kevin Stallard&qu= ot; <kevin@arilab= s.net> wrote:
Weight is everything. =A0Especially at our high altitude on hot summer days= . =A0I recommend you weigh your options by giving considerable weight to yo= ur weight. :)


-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of James Seilbach Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 5:48 AM
To: lml@lancairo= nline.net
Subject: [LML] New Legacy Project

Hello,

I am starting a new Legacy Project in January with 2 weeks of builder assis= tance in Oregon. =A0 I will be building it a KFNL in Colorado. =A0I am tryi= ng to decide which options to build into my project and have been exhaustiv= ely scouring the internet looking for ideas/suggestions. =A0 I have learned= a lot from searching through the archives of this list, Thank you!

One option I am considering is AC, and it looks like N33RH had a pretty int= eresting AC installation with a duct on the bottom of the aircraft. =A0 I h= aven't been able to find out where it came from. =A0 I believe the airc= raft was built by Rich Henning, and I found a website with some information= on it (http://www.lancairlegacy.com/RHGroup.html), but the contact info, = email and phone number, are out of date. =A0 I spoke with Lancair and they = do not have any updated contact information for him either. =A0Does anyone = have current contact information for Rich, possibly he is still subscribed = to this list?

Thanks in advance!

James Seilbach
james@seilbach.com<= /a>
970-6= 91-9305



--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/L= ist.html

--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/L= ist.html
--e89a8f923b0641bf6004cd01f92d--