X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:26:31 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm5.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.91.75] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.6) with SMTP id 5645973 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:08:32 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.91.75; envelope-from=randylsnarr@yahoo.com Received: from [98.139.91.63] by nm5.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jul 2012 19:07:58 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.19] by tm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jul 2012 19:07:58 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1019.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jul 2012 19:07:58 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 162203.10778.bm@omp1019.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 142 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2012 19:07:57 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:References:Mime-Version:In-Reply-To:X-Apple-Yahoo-Original-Message-Folder:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:Cc:X-Mailer:From:X-Apple-Yahoo-Replied-Msgid:Subject:Date:To; b=5wP0SvDDBsCJBP9/BjGMUzCRFXuTq0ivYKDdW0QCwlRgaALMYEkXdsduBCriKtOLCXCeLbRi39qdhKTec3lkKKdlVWuT4pXInzUT3wRs7vJIt3aZ4W09P18pKu7nv/iiGQGtbkjt8ZowgJ91iebuRYq26lWJkc0X8QK+i2NU6d8= ; X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: PGk5fwkVM1kGQbHeaAkz2B5W69pYMlihHjxukRZyghLxowv iiytD7Ai1Jqu7dpHjtJD7GGVJdW1XEs0lhiiwPAsn2GKYEZfyO0NkxZXt0dT pRN3Yd4Iy7AxnJ6wjUTtOvTOyFLhlSXgX7NbiKkYn8ChBKnB1IPY5l0J2KtU CjoTYhSFEMq6HnSP8YcBt0xjYdE6HpmXTWnUQKdZHWuU5upwgxo42kwrbPIh eiHIQYdB0FsnEhIVgUuIGk4lymbnx2i1LE1fLNtNT67I.e3A.C_oU6FEPoL4 TkjBZZbitWEH.eIsc.BuaAT0QnmeB6qB1Eie9QfUVBme9disQsSWFj1eBxUe UYMut3.vKMvkcvtUfcn5IpZAEwtxw6xqSM9OVbfB6FxSEecVJB9.4q4G9tWW jmhgDOMK31mfOnp5Jy72sLrEuZxxE5vHfIHpOeLVFiA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: tg4YEXeswBAq79ZTs5A79J5zDY9lAVNV Received: from [192.168.1.104] (randylsnarr@76.8.220.20 with xymcookie) by smtp116-mob.biz.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jul 2012 12:07:51 -0700 PDT References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8B117) In-Reply-To: X-Apple-Yahoo-Original-Message-Folder: Inbox Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2-715357934 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-Message-Id: <6EF3D14D-D79D-4F51-B126-0098BB3DF4EA@yahoo.com> X-Original-Cc: "lml@lancaironline.net" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8B117) From: Randy X-Apple-Yahoo-Replied-Msgid: 2_0_0_1_418451_AJAPw0MAACdWT/x2eg7TkASYQE4 Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Header tank X-Original-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:08:12 -0600 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List --Apple-Mail-2-715357934 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Gary Edwards is right. Use the good stuff like jeffco gray tank sealer lance= recommends or similar and you are done... You will kick yourself for trying= to save a dew dollars if you have to tear into it later.. Randy Snarr Sent from my iPhone On Jul 10, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Silvio Novelli wro= te: > This resin needs to be chemical resistant to fuels and more flexible than t= he resin used in the tank structure. Mine is a three components epoxy resin a= nd is installed for more than 10 years and flying for almost 3 years with n= o leaks. >=20 > Silvio Novelli > Lancair 320 PP-XSN > +55 (14) 9614-3129 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 10 Jan 2012,w 28, at 2:51 PM, Gary Edwards wrote: >=20 > For me, I would get the best stuff possible, rather than use resin. Once t= he tank is together, going back later if there is a leak that developed afte= r hours of flying is not very enticing. Seems to me that resin is at the bo= ttom of the acceptable list of materials to use. Any flexing of the tank co= uld cause a resin crack.=20 > =20 > Gary Edwards > LNC2 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Stevens Family > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 9:08 AM > Subject: [LML] Header tank >=20 > Just wanted to say thanks to everyone who responded to my original post ab= out sealing the header tank. =46rom those responses the consensus seems to b= e that a couple of coats of resin will suffice. > =20 > Thanks again . > =20 > Regards. > =20 > Rob Stevens > Perth, > Western Australia >=20 --Apple-Mail-2-715357934 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

Gary Edwards is right. Use the good= stuff like jeffco gray tank sealer lance recommends or similar and you are d= one... You will kick yourself for trying to save a dew dollars if you have t= o tear into it later..
Randy Snarr

Sent from my iPho= ne

On Jul 10, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Silvio Novelli <ppxsn@novellisouza.com.br> wrote:<= br>
This res= in needs to be chemical resistant to fuels and more flexible than the resin u= sed in the tank structure. Mine is a three components epoxy resin and is ins= talled for more than 10  years and flying for almost 3 years with no le= aks.

    &= nbsp;Silvio Novelli
 Lancair 320 PP-XSN
+55 (14) 9614-3129




On 10  Jan 2012,w 28, at 2:51 PM, Gary Edwards wrote:
For me, I would get the bes= t stuff possible, rather than use resin.  Once the tank is together, go= ing back later if there is a leak that developed after hours of flying is&nb= sp;not very enticing.  Seems to me that resin is at the bottom of t= he acceptable list of materials to use.  Any flexing of the tank could c= ause a resin crack. 
 
Gary Edwards
= LNC2
----- Original Message -----
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 9= :08 AM
Subject: [LML] Header= tank

Ju= st wanted to say thanks to everyone who responded to my original post about s= ealing the header tank. =46rom those responses the consensus seems to be tha= t a couple of coats of resin will suffice.
 
Thanks again .
Regards.
 
Rob Stevens
Perth,
Western A= ustralia

= --Apple-Mail-2-715357934--