X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:51:03 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from snt0-omc3-s39.snt0.hotmail.com ([65.54.51.76] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.6) with ESMTP id 5645777 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 13:18:49 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.54.51.76; envelope-from=gary21sn@hotmail.com Received: from SNT112-DS6 ([65.55.90.136]) by snt0-omc3-s39.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:18:13 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [71.84.173.173] X-Originating-Email: [gary21sn@hotmail.com] X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: gary21sn@hotmail.com From: "Gary Edwards" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: Header tank X-Original-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:21:02 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00E8_01CD5E85.B58E5E00" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: MSN 9 X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V10.20.0091.1100 Seal-Send-Time: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:21:02 -0700 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Jul 2012 17:18:13.0656 (UTC) FILETIME=[FCCB5180:01CD5EBF] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00E8_01CD5E85.B58E5E00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For me, I would get the best stuff possible, rather than use resin. = Once the tank is together, going back later if there is a leak that = developed after hours of flying is not very enticing. Seems to me that = resin is at the bottom of the acceptable list of materials to use. Any = flexing of the tank could cause a resin crack.=20 Gary Edwards LNC2 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Stevens Family=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 9:08 AM Subject: [LML] Header tank Just wanted to say thanks to everyone who responded to my original = post about sealing the header tank. From those responses the consensus = seems to be that a couple of coats of resin will suffice. =20 Thanks again . =20 Regards. =20 Rob Stevens Perth, Western Australia ------=_NextPart_000_00E8_01CD5E85.B58E5E00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
For me, I would get the best stuff possible, rather than use = resin. =20 Once the tank is together, going back later if there is a leak that = developed=20 after hours of flying is not very enticing.  Seems to me that = resin=20 is at the bottom of the acceptable list of materials to use.  = Any=20 flexing of the tank could cause a resin crack. 
 
Gary Edwards
LNC2
----- Original Message -----
From: Stevens Family
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 = 9:08=20 AM
Subject: [LML] Header = tank

Just wanted to say thanks to everyone who = responded to my=20 original post about sealing the header tank. From those responses the=20 consensus seems to be that a couple of coats of resin will=20 suffice.

 

Thanks again .

 

Regards.

 

Rob Stevens

Perth,

Western=20 Australia

------=_NextPart_000_00E8_01CD5E85.B58E5E00--