X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 13:15:21 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from blu0-omc3-s35.blu0.hotmail.com ([65.55.116.110] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.6) with ESMTP id 5637314 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 20:30:04 -0400 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.116.110; envelope-from=frederickmoreno@bigpond.com Received: from BLU0-SMTP43 ([65.55.116.72]) by blu0-omc3-s35.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 17:29:29 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [121.213.165.106] X-Originating-Email: [frederickmoreno@bigpond.com] X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: frederickmoreno@bigpond.com Received: from Razzle ([121.213.165.106]) by BLU0-SMTP43.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 3 Jul 2012 17:29:28 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:29:12 +0800 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; charset="iso-8859-1"; boundary="------------Boundary-00=_NC1MWY02QL8000000000" X-Mailer: IncrediMail (6295180) From: Frederick Moreno References: X-FID: FLAVOR00-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 X-Priority: 3 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mail (lml@lancaironline.net)" Subject: Re: [LML] Tank sealing X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jul 2012 00:29:28.0934 (UTC) FILETIME=[12C52860:01CD597C] --------------Boundary-00=_NC1MWY02QL8000000000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rob: =0D =0D I talked to Graham Swannell, aero engineering superb, about tank sealing = and he said that epoxy resin was more than adequate. If anyone would know, h= e would. =0D =0D Cheers, =0D =0D Fred =0D =0D =0D =0D =0D -------Original Message-------=0D =0D From: Stevens Family=0D Date: 4/07/2012 1:17:38 AM=0D To: lml@lancaironline.net=0D Subject: [LML] Tank sealing=0D =0D Another question for those who have gone before.=0D =0D The L360 manual which I am using, in the section on the header tank construction, says that I may seal the inside of the tank with primer and then tank sealer (=93PRC 1422=94 is suggested), or with =93two thick coa= ts of resin=94 (page 11-34).=0D =0D I am interested in what others have found to be the best way to go. As I live in Australia, the resin option is much easier than importing the sea= ler However, I suspect there may be more to this decision than just the cost and simplicity advantages of resin. I would really appreciate any advice that others may be willing to offer.=0D =0D Thanks again.=0D =0D Rob Stevens=0D Perth=0D Western Australia.=0D =0D =20 --------------Boundary-00=_NC1MWY02QL8000000000 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi  Rob:
 
I talked to Graham Swannell, aero engineering superb, about tank sea= ling and he said that epoxy resin was more than adequate.  If a= nyone would know, he would. 
 
Cheers,
 
Fred 
 
 
 
 
-= ------Original Message-------
 
Date: 4/07/2012 1:= 17:38 AM
Subject: [LML] Tan= k sealing
 

Another question for those who have gone before.

 

The L360 manual which I am using, in the section on = the header tank construction, says that I may seal the inside of the tank= with primer and then tank sealer (=93PRC 1422=94 is suggested), or  = ;with =93two thick coats of resin=94 (page 11-34).

 

I am interested in what others have found to be the = best way to go. As I live in Australia, the resin option is much easier t= han importing the sealer. However, I suspect there may be more to this de= cision than just the cost and simplicity advantages of resin. I would rea= lly appreciate any advice that others may be willing to offer.=

 

Thanks again.

 

Rob Stevens

Perth

Western Australia.

 

 
--------------Boundary-00=_NC1MWY02QL8000000000--