X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:04:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-f52.google.com ([209.85.160.52] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.5) with ESMTPS id 5593204 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:30:09 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.160.52; envelope-from=billhogarty@gmail.com Received: by pbbro8 with SMTP id ro8so5609938pbb.25 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.221.72 with SMTP id qc8mr28833137pbc.63.1339435772966; Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:29:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.5.139] (ip-64-134-236-145.public.wayport.net. [64.134.236.145]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ny10sm16258858pbb.38.2012.06.11.10.29.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [LML] vm 1000 fuel flo x ducer References: From: Bill Hogarty Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: <55E22E4A-81C2-473C-ACAF-C33B6A5A0A82@gmail.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:29:27 -0700 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Jon Does this K factor have to be changed in the DPU if I replace the transducer= with same make and model? Thanks. Bill H On Jun 11, 2012, at 7:01 AM, jon hadlich wrote: > Don't forget that the fuel flo xducer has a sensor count specific to that u= nit and will vary between units. The K factor must be entered into any engin= e monitor to account for this variance. Most have a place to enter the K fac= tor, but I think you either need a range of K factor or have it burnt to the= eeprom for the VM 1000. > Good luck. >=20 > --=20 > Jon Hadlich > AI Systems > (541) 815-7381