Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 16:25:59 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-5556371@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=184.168.131.14; envelope-from=pete@leapfrogventures.com
From: "pete@leapfrogventures.com" <pete@leapfrogventures.com>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Sealant for hydraulic lines (LNC2)
Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Sealant for hydraulic lines (LNC2)
Thread-Index: Ac05CEo21hAoCSvNT4OrHeygDYVCOwAB+BGQ
References: <redirect-5555209@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <redirect-5555209@logan.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

I thought I read that Teflon tape is a no-no in any aviation related connec=
tion - something about fragments of tape getting into the system and cloggi=
ng orifices.  I think it said only paste type sealants are allowed, and the=
y need to be wiped off the first two threads to avoid getting lumps of past=
e in the system. =20

Pete


-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Brown [mailto:browncc1@verizon.net]=20
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 5:17 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Sealant for hydraulic lines (LNC2)


I agree with Bruce.  My Legacy is put together with no sealer with the exce=
ption (probably unnecessary) of teflon tape on the pipethread fittings.  To=
 my utter surprise, no joints or fittings have leaked despite multiple disa=
ssemblies and reassemblies -- except for the two that I had not tightened, =
one time.

I conclude (again to my surprise) that the flaring process, b-nuts, ferrule=
s, and pipe threads are all pretty robust if even a noob like me can get it=
 right the first time.

Charley Brown
Legacy #299
110 hours