X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 16:25:59 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-db01.mx.aol.com ([205.188.91.95] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.5) with ESMTP id 5556157 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 23 May 2012 14:34:46 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.91.95; envelope-from=MikeEasley@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-db06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-db06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.204]) by imr-db01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q4NIY6Ig011073 for ; Wed, 23 May 2012 14:34:06 -0400 Received: from core-mka001a.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mka001.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.102.65]) by mtaomg-db06.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 729DAE00008F for ; Wed, 23 May 2012 14:34:06 -0400 (EDT) From: MikeEasley@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <5f030.6b3620f7.3cee879e@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 14:34:06 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [LML] Winglet installation opinions? X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_5f030.6b3620f7.3cee879e_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.7 sub 19 X-Originating-IP: [75.71.170.97] x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:476502432:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d33cc4fbd2d9e451a --part1_5f030.6b3620f7.3cee879e_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en One comment I heard back when I was contemplating on whether to make my ES = =20 wing tips removable or not was if you happen to bang into something with=20 your wing tip, it's much easier to repaint a wing tip than an entire wing! =20 Mike Easley Colorado Springs =20 =20 In a message dated 5/23/2012 9:18:07 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time, =20 olsen25@comcast.net writes: =20 Greetings LML Gang,=20 I=E2=80=99m starting on the installation of the winglet on my first wing o= f the=20 IV-P. My desire is to bond the winglets on permanently as I don=E2=80=99t= see a good=20 reason to make them removable. The lights will be removable through their= =20 lens covers. =20 Interested in hearing from other IV-P owners as to whether you have needed= =20 to remove your winglets or not. Would I be making a big mistake by making= =20 them permanent?=20 Dan Olsen=20 Fort Collins, CO=20 N320DK, 320 MKII =E2=80=93 635hrs=20 IV-P =E2=80=93 7% complete=20 --part1_5f030.6b3620f7.3cee879e_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en

One comment I heard back when I was contemplating on whether to make m= y ES=20 wing tips removable or not was if you happen to bang into something with yo= ur=20 wing tip, it's much easier to repaint a wing tip than an entire wing!

Mike Easley

Colorado Springs

In a message dated 5/23/2012 9:18:07 A.M. Mountain Daylight Time,=20 olsen25@comcast.net writes:

Greetings LML Gang,

I=E2=80=99m starting on the installation of the wing= let on my first=20 wing of the IV-P. My desire is to bond the winglets on permanently = as I=20 don=E2=80=99t see a good reason to make them removable. The lights = will be=20 removable through their lens covers.

Interested in hearing from other IV-P owners as to w= hether=20 you have needed to remove your winglets or not. Would I be making a= big=20 mistake by making them permanent?

Dan Olsen

Fort Collins, CO

N320DK, 320 MKII =E2=80=93 635hrs

IV-P =E2=80=93 7% complete

&= nbsp; &nbs= p; &= nbsp; =20

--part1_5f030.6b3620f7.3cee879e_boundary--