X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 14:31:53 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-5533359@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <j.hafen@comcast.net>
Received: from qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.32] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.5)
  with ESMTP id 5532976 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 11 May 2012 11:06:20 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.30.32; envelope-from=j.hafen@comcast.net
Received: from omta16.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.72])
	by qmta03.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id 8cwl1j0031ZMdJ4A3f5jdP; Fri, 11 May 2012 15:05:43 +0000
Received: from Legent ([76.104.242.96])
	by omta16.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id 8f5f1j00225W5K88cf5iL3; Fri, 11 May 2012 15:05:43 +0000
From: "John Hafen" <j.hafen@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-5532234@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-5532234@logan.com>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Necessity of A/C in IV-P? IV-P still beats EA50
X-Original-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 08:05:42 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID: <010c01cd2f87$895657c0$9c030740$@comcast.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_010D_01CD2F4C.DCFEABB0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJy/PposmoXtImJzrztKYZaPi9Ql5V5FGFw
Content-Language: en-us