X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 09:00:15 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm13-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.91.89] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.5) with SMTP id 5518419 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 01 May 2012 20:34:09 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.138.91.89; envelope-from=charliekohler@yahoo.com Received: from [98.138.90.49] by nm13.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2012 00:33:35 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.245] by tm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2012 00:33:35 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1059.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 May 2012 00:33:35 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 80790.11009.bm@omp1059.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 14466 invoked by uid 60001); 2 May 2012 00:33:35 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mgtR7RsKkw7EitbQu7xy6a8+qaPIRZrEWxi4qGebRDCx/fQSQPb/F85lZoh8VZzf8lC2++/VDwy94a7Nj1JVirCxM/gHLnLQJYyMRzAg6nLRdPk90B7Out0smZgoH+TOSCYpZEdsV939xON1FIB501s+XD16e8KUmPZwyfWmWiw=; X-YMail-OSG: 1o2MsiMVM1nRqFwfr.Ywo.LXGxANuMx8HHzAY.LqX1YAvFD 9tD96STvmnff0hQoGNKlMfzz3ne5azAVxd597hTXiXd7fNSYt4KHGq0c8_8Z .DeaUwe12YKgMimVg2G.7OkaHKClswToOETNdMaNHzZmd3U9zqap7suCC2YN 9PDWecqiy7LBH2rox2mE9t4gmC_Z4RJPx.cHgoE4vCqnSNEbFvQkv_udL.BL zBsDaR7eBYH_cZynaWH92okHV5HhA6Lm_wpHtlmiKhGAa_NGN1JuUJkST7T1 bamrK7a_sN29RFBjkwSjjl6vRDTwZcbJFmKxqU1gtF.meqnI7XvoWqMFVgo3 ifkYtINdykAbYCyEIaz2.egJCWMw7.smHgMEKW2mUjPPBiF5RL7vBgCypnGY njA2tpABMJNKoceBJvgLwQ3aC32SC1FOzepM.VXmaJgsfGvxrIuahMWmM1ot kHpRY.Vw.ywDCnDCPa1gmS16YDJYTZ4iMtnoJs2F_ltkWQIlVijGZNdiHJbo f7rF9JEsWks7kIVQ4AZo- Received: from [72.189.192.203] by web126002.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 01 May 2012 17:33:34 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.117.340979 X-Original-Message-ID: <1335918814.3048.YahooMailNeo@web126002.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 17:33:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Charlie Kohler Reply-To: Charlie Kohler Subject: Accident X-Original-To: LancairList MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1915680061-131836161-1335918814=:3048" ---1915680061-131836161-1335918814=:3048 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A=0A=0AHi Stan,=0AIf you can convince your DAR ---=0A(Try to find one tha= t does not have build experience on the Lancair IV?)=0A(if he even notices = the holes?)=0A--- that these holes do not detract from the strength of the = airframe-- then you move into the next step-- where you are a bona fide gen= uine test pilot.=0A=A0All you are risking is your life and several hundred = thousand dollars.=0ASeriously,=0Athere are several principles that I found = difficult to understand when I began working with composites. And by the wa= y of my inspections --many others also.=0AAdding more material (glass or ca= rbon) to a airframe makes it stronger.=0AAdding more resin makes it stronge= r.=0AIf you take away a little material here you can add reinforcement ther= e=A0and it will be just as strong and maybe even stronger.=0AAll of the sta= tements are false. In fact-some are- just the opposite. The designer/ engin= eer looks at load path.=0AYou can't cut the holes and put a reinforcing rin= g on the lip and expect it to carry the same load and flutter resistance. = =0AMany years ago I worked as a technician in International Harvester Motor= Truck engineering department in the stress lab. I learned enough to know t= hat things are not always what they seem. They need to be proved by enginee= ring data and by testing. Our problem with flight testing with the IV is th= at a failure is usually fatal. =0AI think we have blamed thunderstorms and = weather decisions=A0as they are=A0a conveniant scapegoat.=A0=A0 =0A=A0=0AI = was number eight to fly. I built my airplane beginning in December 1991. I = believe I had a superior adhesive system in Shell Teta. They were preaching= "build light" in those days. Today putting several gallons of fuel tank se= alers in the cabin is considered good practice! Upholstery is right out of = the Lexus with the heaviest leathers and fabrics available. By way of contr= ast, Dairy Queen weighed 1995 pounds without finish paint (but with tons of= primer and silicone resin) and just basic upholstery. (Seats and side pane= ls). It has over 2500 hours and many many hours in the mountain West being = kicked around. =0ABut would I cut a hole(s) in the fuselage? =0ATo install = marginal airconditioner??=A0 Not on your life. =0AStan, if I were you, I wo= uld start by asking Lancair to provide engineering data. And I would ask LO= BO to help. =0A=0ACharlie K.=0A=0ASee me on the web at =0Awww.Lancair-IV.co= m=0A ---1915680061-131836161-1335918814=:3048 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 
Hi Stan,
If you can convince your DAR ---
(Try to find one that does not have build experience on the Lancair IV= ?)
(if he even notices the holes?)
--- that these holes do not detract from the strength of the airframe-= - then you move into the next step-- where you are a bona fide genuine test= pilot.
 All you are risking is your life and several hundred thousand do= llars.
Seriously,
there are several principles that I found difficult to understand when= I began working with composites. And by the way of my inspections --many o= thers also.
Adding more material (glass or carbon) to a airframe makes it stronger= .
Adding more resin makes it stronger.
If you take away a little material here you can add reinforcement ther= e and it will be just as strong and maybe even stronger.
All of the statements are false. In fact-some are- just the opposite. = The designer/ engineer looks at load path.
You can't cut the holes and put a reinforcing ring on the lip and expe= ct it to carry the same load and flutter resistance.
Many years ago I worked as a technician in International Harvester Mot= or Truck engineering department in the stress lab. I learned enough to know= that things are not always what they seem. They need to be proved by engin= eering data and by testing. Our problem with flight testing with the IV is = that a failure is usually fatal.
I think we have blamed thunderstorms and= weather decisions as they are a conveniant scapegoat.  = ;
 
I was number eight to fly. I built my airplane beginning in December 1= 991. I believe I had a superior adhesive system in Shell Teta. They were pr= eaching "build light" in those days. Today putting several gallons of fuel = tank sealers in the cabin is considered good practice! Upholstery is right = out of the Lexus with the heaviest leathers and fabrics available. By way o= f contrast, Dairy Queen weighed 1995 pounds without finish paint (but with = tons of primer and silicone resin) and just basic upholstery. (Seats and si= de panels). It has over 2500 hours and many many hours in the mountain West= being kicked around.
But would I cut a hole(s) in the fuselage?
To install marginal airconditioner??  Not on your life.
Stan, if I were you, I would start by asking Lancair to provide engine= ering data. And I would ask LOBO to help.
 
Charlie K.
 
See me on the web at
 
---1915680061-131836161-1335918814=:3048--