|
|
|
Steve, Rob, et al
Well, when Rob's light bulb went on it was a CFL and took a day to brighten
up. Grayhawk may know his aircraft performance but he should not be
trusted with details from 21 years ago...... He often needs help, like the
following photos.
First, here is a picture of the elevator half joining [-shaped
aluminum bracket with the original aluminum bell crank arms attached.
Note they are not affixed to the bottom of the bracket as the befuddled Grayhawk
claimed):
Of course, the bracket is upside down and this pic was taken with an
old-fashioned film camera after 1321 hours into the slow build process on
5-24-1991.
I found one of the original black anodized arms in my junk box as seen
below:
If one considers the fiberglass covering the bracket, the hole to the hinge
line distance is about 4 inches. If the hole is moved in by an inch,
then the throw and force is changed by about 25% as stated in the original
Grayhawk email. Of course, a little trig is required to calculate the
actual distance movement at the rod end.
Here is a pic of the "3 inch" arm as it is now installed:
The distance from the bottom of the elevator skin to the center of the bolt
is 7/8".
BTW, these recent pix were taken with my I-Phone -- how far we've
come!
The wiser Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk (a strange ancient alter-ego)
PS the black line beneath the nut is not a crack, but merely a scratch in
the white paint.
In a message dated 3/7/2012 7:01:16 A.M. Central Standard Time,
n5276j@aol.com writes:
Grayhawk,
I do have the black anodized aluminum brackets, also the kit was from
11/1989 #471. I did not buy the kit back then, picked it up years ago and
finished it. Measuring it on the airplane it looks like 3" defienty not 4". I
don't understand the 2.5" or 3" addition? I have 7 tt and no problem
with the pitch not near as bad as a KR2 which I flew for many years
and hours.
Rob got my attention when he talked about the different colors which made
me think of steel and I thought my was aluminum. It does look like
it was change to 3" .
I built in a trim tab (9x3) with mac servo that works almost
perfect. Can't quite trim down at full speed flaps reflexed but just a bump on
the flap switch fix's it. It does however trim up on approach. I could
re-adjust for cruise but would loose approach or build a bigger tab. I think
I'll leave it alone.
Was there any problems with the aluminum brackets?
Steve Alderman 360 7TT
-----Original
Message----- From: Sky2high <Sky2high@aol.com> To: lml lml@lancaironline.net. Sent: Tue,
Mar 6, 2012 12:03 pm Subject: [LML] Re: LNC2 - Harmonization between pitch
and roll
Steve,
Well, it depends........ If you got a standard kit with the optional
hardware package circa 1989, you would have received black anodized
aluminum brackets with a distance of 4 inches when bolted to the bottom
of the elevator's [-shaped center forward spar to the push-rod
mounting hole.
However, the hinge point is at the top of that style elevator and that
adds 2.5 or 3 inches to the "arm". Thanks to Rob, the light
bulb came on and I have to retract the statement that the change
represented 25% in force and throw. If one measures from the
hinge line, the arm went from about 7 inches to 6 inches when the bracket hole
was moved 1" (or 6.5 to 5.5). Perhaps I should drill another hole to
shorten it further, as long as the push rod doesn't engage a bulkhead or
the elevator through the full range of the elevator. Uh, I don't think I
will since the pitch stick force is already pretty heavy in a 2G
pull and my pitch system, including trim, system is balanced quite nicely
right now.
If you got the MKII center hinged elevator, the arm may be of a different
length and finish, but yielding similar results --- or maybe not.
The 200 and 300 series Lancairs have the most options and
modifications of any kits I have ever seen...... And you want an exact
measurement without specifying the details of the elevator system?
I know nothing about when Lancair changed the bracket or how it was
changed. In any event, the kit date is very important.
Grayhawk AKA Scott
N92EX 320
In a message dated 3/6/2012 9:31:51 A.M. Central Standard Time, n5276j@aol.com
writes:
Hi ALL
I think all us new flyers could use the exact measurement from the
hinge point to the attach hole. Also what is this bracket made from?
steel ?
steve alderman 360 7 TT and
counting
-----Original
Message----- From: rwolf99 < rwolf99@aol.com> To: lml < lml@lancaironline.net> Sent:
Tue, Mar 6, 2012 5:39 am Subject: [LML] Re: LNC2 - Harminization between
pitch and roll
Bill is right. Handling qualities are all about stick
FORCE. Stick displacement is not the issue, as long as you have enough room
to push the stick as far as you need.
Moving a pivot point in the linkage closer to the axis of rotation will
increase stick force, and also reduce stick travel, for a given elevator
displacement (i.e. for a given aircraft response). The Lancair 320
accomplished this in the 1990's by changing the elevator weldment (the
bracket bolted to the elevator that the aft pushrod attaches to). The new
weldment moved the attach point 1 inch closer to the axis of rotation (just
as Bill said). But fear not, the earlier guys just drilled an extra
hole in their weldment and ignored the original hole. In principle you
can do this anywhere in the system, but it seems to be easiest to implement
out at the tail.
I have both weldments in my hangar. The old one is kinda gold,
almost as though it were cadmium plated like an AN bolt. The new one
is silver, almost as though it were chrome plated. But the bottom line
is the number of inches away from the pivot point. If I recall
correctly the new one is 2 point something inches away and the old one is 3
point something inches. (Big help, huh?) I would have to go to
the hangar to check.
This mod is fairly benign.
Keeping the CG forward helps, too, but is harder
to accomplish. Moving a battery from behind the seat to the front
of the passenger footwell might be worth investigating if you don't have
rudder pedals there.
- Rob
Wolf |
|