X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 14:02:04 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-da03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.145] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTP id 5430698 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:35:12 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.105.145; envelope-from=rwolf99@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.77]) by imr-da03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q26GYVu2010311 for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 11:34:31 -0500 Received: from core-dqb001a.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-dqb001.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.212.193]) by mtaomg-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id AF339E00008D for ; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 11:34:31 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: LNC2 - Harmonization between pitch and roll X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: rwolf99@aol.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CEC9CE243BF6C7_840_27879_webmail-d045.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 35683-STANDARD Received: from 216.207.126.66 by webmail-d045.sysops.aol.com (205.188.181.80) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:34:31 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CEC9CE24300FDD-840-A1D9@webmail-d045.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [216.207.126.66] X-Original-Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 11:34:31 -0500 (EST) x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:458468096:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d294d4f563c972a2e This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8CEC9CE243BF6C7_840_27879_webmail-d045.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" <> I will go to the hangar this weekend and measure. I may also have a copy o= f the LML bulletin (how we communicated in the 1990's) from the factory whi= ch introduced this modification. If so, I'll scan it and post it. The "elevator weldment" is a two-piece bracket. One attaches to each eleva= tor and they are bolted together, capturing the back end of the aft elevato= r pushrod and ensuring the elevators move in unison. A part of the bracket= hits the stabilizer as the control stop -- one for up deflection and one f= or down deflection. There should be pieces of phenolic bonded to the top a= nd bottom of the stabilizer. Yes, it is steel. - Rob Wolf ----------MB_8CEC9CE243BF6C7_840_27879_webmail-d045.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
<<I think all us new flyers could use the exact measurement from= the hinge point to the attach hole. Also what is this bracket made from?&n= bsp; steel ?>>
 
I will go to the hangar this weekend and measure.  I may also hav= e a copy of the LML bulletin (how we communicated in the 1990's) from the f= actory which introduced this modification.  If so, I'll scan it and po= st it.
 
The "elevator weldment" is a two-piece bracket.  One attaches to = each elevator and they are bolted together, capturing the back end of the a= ft elevator pushrod and ensuring the elevators move in unison.  A part= of the bracket hits the stabilizer as the control stop -- one for up defle= ction and one for down deflection.  There should be pieces of phenolic= bonded to the top and bottom of the stabilizer.  Yes, it is steel.
 
- Rob Wolf
 
 
----------MB_8CEC9CE243BF6C7_840_27879_webmail-d045.sysops.aol.com--