X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 07:39:36 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-db02.mx.aol.com ([205.188.91.96] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTP id 5430011 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 23:13:40 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.91.96; envelope-from=rwolf99@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.77]) by imr-db02.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q264D4Kf011769 for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 23:13:04 -0500 Received: from core-dqa005b.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-dqa005.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.211.209]) by mtaomg-mb06.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 9F378E00008C for ; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 23:13:04 -0500 (EST) X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] LNC2 - Harminization between pitch and roll X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: rwolf99@aol.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CEC9668FF4B4CB_698_163D8_Webmail-d109.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 35683-STANDARD Received: from 97.115.228.175 by Webmail-d109.sysops.aol.com (205.188.171.203) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 05 Mar 2012 23:13:04 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CEC9668FE66C91-698-577D@Webmail-d109.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [97.115.228.175] X-Original-Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 23:13:04 -0500 (EST) x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:427003168:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d294d4f558ed03a45 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8CEC9668FF4B4CB_698_163D8_Webmail-d109.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Bill is right. Handling qualities are all about stick FORCE. Stick displac= ement is not the issue, as long as you have enough room to push the stick a= s far as you need. Moving a pivot point in the linkage closer to the axis of rotation will inc= rease stick force, and also reduce stick travel, for a given elevator displ= acement (i.e. for a given aircraft response). The Lancair 320 accomplished= this in the 1990's by changing the elevator weldment (the bracket bolted t= o the elevator that the aft pushrod attaches to). The new weldment moved th= e attach point 1 inch closer to the axis of rotation (just as Bill said). = But fear not, the earlier guys just drilled an extra hole in their weldment= and ignored the original hole. In principle you can do this anywhere in t= he system, but it seems to be easiest to implement out at the tail. I have both weldments in my hangar. The old one is kinda gold, almost as t= hough it were cadmium plated like an AN bolt. The new one is silver, almos= t as though it were chrome plated. But the bottom line is the number of in= ches away from the pivot point. If I recall correctly the new one is 2 poi= nt something inches away and the old one is 3 point something inches. (Big= help, huh?) I would have to go to the hangar to check. This mod is fairly benign. =20 Keeping the CG forward helps, too, but is harder to accomplish. Moving a b= attery from behind the seat to the front of the passenger footwell might be= worth investigating if you don't have rudder pedals there. - Rob Wolf ----------MB_8CEC9668FF4B4CB_698_163D8_Webmail-d109.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Bill is right.  Handling qualities are all about stick = FORCE. Stick displacement is not the issue, as long as you have enough room= to push the stick as far as you need.
 
Moving a pivot point in the linkage closer to the axis of rotation wil= l increase stick force, and also reduce stick travel, for a given elevator = displacement (i.e. for a given aircraft response).  The Lancair 320 ac= complished this in the 1990's by changing the elevator weldment (the bracke= t bolted to the elevator that the aft pushrod attaches to). The new weldmen= t moved the attach point 1 inch closer to the axis of rotation (just as Bil= l said).  But fear not, the earlier guys just drilled an extra hole in= their weldment and ignored the original hole.  In principle you can d= o this anywhere in the system, but it seems to be easiest to implement out = at the tail.
 
I have both weldments in my hangar.  The old one is kinda gold, a= lmost as though it were cadmium plated like an AN bolt.  The new one i= s silver, almost as though it were chrome plated.  But the bottom line= is the number of inches away from the pivot point.  If I recall corre= ctly the new one is 2 point something inches away and the old one is 3 poin= t something inches.  (Big help, huh?)  I would have to go to the = hangar to check.
 
This mod is fairly benign. 
 
Keeping the CG forward helps, too, but is harder to accomplish.&n= bsp; Moving a battery from behind the seat to the front of the passenger fo= otwell might be worth investigating if you don't have rudder pedals there.<= /div>
 
- Rob Wolf
----------MB_8CEC9668FF4B4CB_698_163D8_Webmail-d109.sysops.aol.com--