X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:42:35 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm20-vm0.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([66.94.236.29] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with SMTP id 5415162 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:07:13 -0500 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.94.236.29; envelope-from=browncc1@verizon.net Received: from [66.94.237.127] by nm20.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Feb 2012 17:06:38 -0000 Received: from [66.94.237.119] by tm2.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Feb 2012 17:06:38 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1024.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Feb 2012 17:06:38 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 228177.68479.bm@omp1024.access.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 71156 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2012 17:06:37 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: ugLcSeEVM1mgeiTSE7zi7Cb6r4p3QivpXcf4yf85tIoeDR1 nUflgEfSRe9S7uCz.ccuAnSZIQ_t4uX_Q9wPi1ubE4yu8fBusMGLatu6Eo67 UsgzqmQZ5elzc4nKsmsnOdyfiWU0coOL3nyMoiKuuczUMRBbCAEzSCubiYiZ a2IXDo5lMtkmnwGt72jcGdYnQV.eC3BcaD3SDCNsVkQrw1M05d9KxOK3AHnZ HSugEJnx5jL4P8BbCD1dey.5B4NVrJpaJiz7ymXx6lRT.jl9RALDxJhV1QYJ L97xlYmoDOustgmzMYZ7qKemsZiYNfmLPAf4Si.nyn0yBkG0AeljBhNJN5C_ HigLBIQ.iT_i_Rqh4wk6FG1tIWPu_qe9yqHcaq5roXx2.KbG4vuI6ZIub8yL QNEEX8Zful906pR6y5oLHZNFiTNKMG38iEwKiHqLl81mxosW8DSd2WWzPz.5 qIwct.Ls- X-Yahoo-SMTP: F49l9g6swBC0R9n8vJIbm7Tf3P8Xlmia8rHIwTlO__Ml Received: from chass-imac-2.home (browncc1@72.64.81.165 with plain) by smtp101.vzn.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Feb 2012 09:06:37 -0800 PST From: Charles Brown Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-16--304921633 Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 360 rudder balance X-Original-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:06:36 -0600 In-Reply-To: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: X-Original-Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) --Apple-Mail-16--304921633 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Grayhawk, Control surface balancing has nothing whatsoever to do with gravity or = with surfaces hanging level when mounted. Gravity hinge moments are (a) = small (b) steady (c) in the case of ailerons and rudder, invisible = to the pilot (d) in the case of elevators, trivial at most and can be = taken out with the trim tab as desired. Control surface balancing is about making sure that if the surface = starts to flap up and down at very high speeds and dynamic pressure, = when vortex shedding frequencies start to match natural frequencies of = the structure, it doesn't through inertial coupling excite a = corresponding motion in the fixed surface it's mounted to (wing, = vertical stabilizer, horizontal stabilizer) and drive the whole = collective structure unstable. The best way to prevent inertical = coupling is to have the CG of the moveable surface exactly at the = hingeline -- neither above, below, ahead or behind. That's possible in = a centerline hinge, not possible in a hinge that's on the top surface. = The best compromise for a top-surface hinge is to have the CG directly = below the hinge. CB On Feb 24, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Sky2high@aol.com wrote: Gents, =20 Chris is right. In other words: =20 Interesting. Think about a balance beam scale used by that Justice = lady. First, if the weights were above the pivot point, the = scale/system would be unstable. Notice that the weights hang much below = the pivot making the system stable and, should it be perfect, the beam = would stay in whatever position if the weights were equal. But, such = scales have a very slight built in bias to only be in balance when the = beam is level. =20 ... Grayhawk= --Apple-Mail-16--304921633 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Sky2high@aol.com = wrote:
Gents,
 
Chris is right.  In other words:
 
Interesting.  Think about a balance beam scale used by that = Justice=20 lady.  First, if the weights were above the pivot point, the=20= scale/system would be unstable.  Notice that the weights hang much = below=20 the pivot making the system stable and, should it be perfect, the beam = would=20 stay in whatever position if the weights were equal.  But, such = scales have=20 a very slight built in bias to only be in balance when the beam is=20= level.
 
=
...

Grayhawk
= = --Apple-Mail-16--304921633--