X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:30:42 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [69.84.129.244] (HELO asp.reflexion.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPS id 5408168 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:40:33 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=69.84.129.244; envelope-from=cberland@systems3.net Received: (qmail 3830 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2012 14:39:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-cs-03.app.dca.reflexion.local) (10.81.19.3) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with SMTP; 21 Feb 2012 14:39:56 -0000 Received: by mail-cs-03.app.dca.reflexion.local (Reflexion email security v6.60.3) with SMTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:39:56 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 32495 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2012 14:39:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO remote.systems3.net) (98.172.79.178) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 21 Feb 2012 14:39:55 -0000 Received: from S3SBS08SERVER.Systems3.local ([fe80::6077:364b:fa39:c71b]) by S3SBS08SERVER.Systems3.local ([fe80::6077:364b:fa39:c71b%10]) with mapi; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 07:39:02 -0700 From: Craig Berland. X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List X-Original-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 07:39:01 -0700 Subject: [LML] Re: Fine wire vs regular spark plugs Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Fine wire vs regular spark plugs Thread-Index: AczwoVMJdQ37AzEWTsqbU9KIyV60swABDx6Q X-Original-Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D7A6B5700A0803448C27264F1F5387364EAD0E0321S3SBS08SERVER_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_D7A6B5700A0803448C27264F1F5387364EAD0E0321S3SBS08SERVER_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable George, I would think about 500 degF LOP would be considered severe and I c= ould see how that "might" crack the insulator. Possible scenario: at 500 = degF LOP the engine has long ago quit running, the pilot stalls the airplan= e, the airplane crashes into a mountain and the insulator cracks.....there = you go...severe LOP :) Craig Berland There was one slide that showed a badly eroded massive and it was blamed on= "severe LOP operation". I have trouble understanding this link but maybe = there's data to support it. Ah... could someone tell me what "severe LOP operation" IS ? Or, stated another way - - is that 10 d LOP ? 50 d LOP ? 100 d LO= P ? 150 d LOP ? George Braly --_000_D7A6B5700A0803448C27264F1F5387364EAD0E0321S3SBS08SERVER_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<= p class=3DMsoNormal>George, I would think about 500 degF LOP would b= e considered severe and I could see how that “might” crack the = insulator. Possible scenario: at 500 degF LOP the engine has lo= ng ago quit running, the pilot stalls the airplane, the airplane crashes in= to a mountain and the insulator cracks…..there you go…severe LO= P J

&n= bsp;

Craig Berland

There wa= s one slide that showed a badly eroded massive and it was blamed on "s= evere LOP operation". I have trouble understanding this link but= maybe there's data to support it.

Ah… could someone tell me what= “severe LOP operation” IS ?

Or, stated another way - - is= that 10 d LOP ? 50 d LOP ? = 100 d LOP ? 150 d LOP ? = George Braly

<= /span>

= --_000_D7A6B5700A0803448C27264F1F5387364EAD0E0321S3SBS08SERVER_--