X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:49:22 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail.5000feet.com ([74.115.8.50] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with ESMTP id 5136176 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:04:46 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.115.8.50; envelope-from=Tim@myrv10.com Received: from [192.168.0.40] (RV10net [216.222.162.27]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.5000feet.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/TO20110516) with ESMTP id p8Q44Aue023188 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2011 23:04:11 -0500 Subject: Re: [LML] Re: IPAD Program References: From: Tim Olson Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--599765154 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8E401) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: <875C476D-8751-44C2-B3DD-3B2FE27DDC17@MyRV10.com> X-Original-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 23:04:09 -0500 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8E401) --Apple-Mail-1--599765154 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Actually, I have and use both and I think Wingx is better for IFR and forefl= ight is better for Preflight. Tim On Sep 25, 2011, at 10:37 PM, "John Barrett" wrote: > Both have a one month free subscription. Try them out. I read a review a= few months back where the verdict was that both were very good. The review= er thought Foreflight had the edge for IFR flight and WingXPro appealed to h= im as better for VFR flight. >=20 > =20 >=20 > Google the reviews and see what you find. >=20 > =20 >=20 > I=E2=80=99m using Foreflight and like it a lot, but will sample WingX Pro b= efore too long. I like the split screen idea of WingX Pro and am looking fo= rward to trying that out. >=20 > =20 >=20 > John Barrett >=20 > =20 >=20 > From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Wil= liam A. Hogarty > Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 6:05 PM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] IPAD Program >=20 > =20 >=20 > Gang: >=20 > Finally got my hands on an IPAD. Can anyone give me a recommendation betw= een Foreflight and the WingsX program. >=20 > Thanks, Bill Hogarty >=20 > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 10.0.1410 / Virus Database: 1520/3917 - Release Date: 09/24/11 --Apple-Mail-1--599765154 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Actually, I have and use both and I thi= nk Wingx is better for IFR and foreflight is better for Preflight.
Tim



On Sep 25, 2011, at 10:37 PM, "John Barrett" &= lt;jbarrett@carbinge.com> wr= ote:

Both have a one= month free subscription.  Try them out.  I read a review a few mo= nths back where the verdict was that both were very good.  The reviewer= thought Foreflight had the edge for IFR flight and WingXPro appealed to him= as better for VFR flight.

 

Google the reviews and see what you find.

 <= /span>

I=E2=80=99m using= Foreflight and like it a lot, but will sample WingX Pro before too long.&nb= sp; I like the split screen idea of WingX Pro and am looking forward to tryi= ng that out.

 

John Barrett

 

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lan= caironline.net] On Behalf Of William A. Hogarty
Sent: Satur= day, September 24, 2011 6:05 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] IPAD Program

 

Gang:

Fi= nally got my hands on an IPAD.  Can anyone give me a recommendation bet= ween Foreflight and the WingsX program.

Thanks, Bill Hogarty

=

No virus found in this message.
Checke= d by AVG - www= .avg.com
Version: 10.0.1410 / Virus Database: 1520/3917 - Release= Date: 09/24/11

= --Apple-Mail-1--599765154--