X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 23:37:08 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from carbinge.com ([69.5.27.218] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.1) with SMTP id 5135419 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:47:27 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=69.5.27.218; envelope-from=jbarrett@carbinge.com Received: (qmail 16272 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2011 03:46:53 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; h=X-Originating-IP:Reply-To:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; s=default; d=carbinge.com; b=gHYlIFMKpgFDgsyKZYMB9dM4ZgI0qMiHpYkj6zmvCeP6O6r7kMxu7SUR3A3VibBrb6g0hkyvkL9LKVRfD18EZ2+e7FolCyxcNoSx3bn/wKSW9XmrRstW9ZaJbNsAPmgC7IF4B3GNd1fZtgcmqsGXrpylEsa18aYyaOWmxOUuuts=; X-Originating-IP: [24.143.115.250] Reply-To: From: "John Barrett" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] IPAD Program X-Original-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:46:52 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <010c01cc7b35$c39d70a0$4ad851e0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_010D_01CC7AFB.173E98A0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Acx7HznAOqrVpcEMQXqZwdU3BJxeBwAFhyJg Content-Language: en-us This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_010D_01CC7AFB.173E98A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Both have a one month free subscription. Try them out. I read a review a few months back where the verdict was that both were very good. The reviewer thought Foreflight had the edge for IFR flight and WingXPro appealed to him as better for VFR flight. Google the reviews and see what you find. I'm using Foreflight and like it a lot, but will sample WingX Pro before too long. I like the split screen idea of WingX Pro and am looking forward to trying that out. John Barrett From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of William A. Hogarty Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 6:05 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] IPAD Program Gang: Finally got my hands on an IPAD. Can anyone give me a recommendation between Foreflight and the WingsX program. Thanks, Bill Hogarty _____ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1410 / Virus Database: 1520/3917 - Release Date: 09/24/11 ------=_NextPart_000_010D_01CC7AFB.173E98A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Both have a one month free subscription. Try them out. I = read a review a few months back where the verdict was that both were = very good. The reviewer thought Foreflight had the edge for IFR = flight and WingXPro appealed to him as better for VFR = flight.

Google the reviews and see what you find.

I’m using Foreflight and like it a lot, but will sample WingX = Pro before too long. I like the split screen idea of WingX Pro and = am looking forward to trying that out.

John Barrett

From:= = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = William A. Hogarty
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 6:05 = PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] IPAD = Program

Gang:

Finally got my hands on an IPAD. = Can anyone give me a recommendation between Foreflight and the WingsX = program.

Thanks, Bill Hogarty

No virus found in this = message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1410 / = Virus Database: 1520/3917 - Release Date: = 09/24/11

------=_NextPart_000_010D_01CC7AFB.173E98A0--