Return-Path: Received: from imo-r16.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.70]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:50:05 -0400 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-r16.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v27.10.) id k.60.47477f2 (3311) for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:56:08 -0400 (EDT) From: RWolf99@aol.com Message-ID: <60.47477f2.268a1a88@aol.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 10:56:08 EDT Subject: 360 Nose Gear Strut Service Bulletin To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> What's the general consensus on the wisdom of having a 360 nose strut re-worked to replace the roll pin with the clamp? I'm not flying yet so I'm in no danger, but what's the service history here? How many people has this happened to? What's the general result of a failure -- is it merely a loosely swiveling wheel, does the wheel fall off, does loss of control on landing happen? Presumably, there would not be a service bulletin issued if it wasn't worth fixing, but... If this is an isolated occurrence with a benign failure mode I'd be willing to wait until later to get it fixed. If, say, greater than 10% of the airplanes have had a problem, or the effect is to cause severe damage, I'll do it sooner. Inspecting before flight is fine, but what about doing 6 or 8 touch-and-goes? You can't inspect prior to each landing. What say you? - Rob Wolf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>