X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 23:59:54 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web33704.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.201.201] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.11) with SMTP id 4666700 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 23:55:24 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.201.201; envelope-from=flycassutts@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 74647 invoked by uid 60001); 7 Jan 2011 04:54:49 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1+pb1+U6aIn92cIwsQoO6qlmotROF0SlsccimleIxc6WDZQf9O46Fi6udR250hEAisq/OoQ+slizVMmQfWuGWzeUOnvBWErOMZpHmVZZR16ClFwdzO70oVQjAvToxuwaWSe4p8pBciN43t8762dJdfkpAiwNFiCePYFX7BWIelQ=; X-Original-Message-ID: <529736.66551.qm@web33704.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: pYwYi.sVM1lWZVy4Q4hOcwpu4DfdoWhawhjCq.0jUfZ4YlM kDf7GsYJnCPcTh6KPzZvKtHi5M8VI87f3i2UoWyy2fU2KHBYZb9cycIJHUhV Zg9ZgKNCtxwR3PPHwFyvPJcyd2FRlJm65qqjHE_b40OzohexKTTJ.Dxcxv2x WTG_SpMOt_thrW7T.wQdO6.98OktdQXp6FUg3hQ6iiEm_gZR4nW5MMJCp.Rl NoSCRk427_aOqoup4cSAAk2k_BENINmQ8pFwYIp_ON18qmeLvSlfJpX.bSCq zNIoM2lmiUqdOc4Qw0lxikNiiqmhM0nQLVBCU5QBDPSnCmYWP48sIMM8h1lh RKhOjzRlnAwPT7S_Y13w.kReraQqhHytF58OmtJY9a5i5V054OTJfOaMyQf9 m0HGlZgtCjUY- Received: from [71.208.232.64] by web33704.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:54:49 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 References: X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 20:54:49 -0800 (PST) From: Art Jensen Subject: Re: [LML] Legacy without Static Wicks X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-864519138-1294376089=:66551" --0-864519138-1294376089=:66551 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gary,=0A=0AI believe it is fair to say that the majority of Legacy's are fl= ying around =0Awithout static wicks.=C2=A0 I only know of one that used to = have them but they have =0Abeen removed.=C2=A0 I am speaking of 199L, the d= emo Legacy that Lancair has been =0Ausing for years.=0A=0AArt=0A=0A=0A=0A= =0A________________________________=0AFrom: Linda and Gary Weeks =0ATo: lml@lancaironline.net=0ASent: Thu, January 6, 2011 9:= 12:52 PM=0ASubject: [LML] Legacy without Static Wicks=0A=0A=0AG=E2=80=99Day= All,=0A=C2=A0=0AI am interested in hearing from anyone out there flying a = Lancair Legacy without =0Ahaving static wicks fitted.=0A=C2=A0=0AI would li= ke to hear what avionics equipment you have installed and if it is =0Aaffec= ted at any stage.=0A=C2=A0=0AHappy to hear from anyone for or against the i= dea of flying the Legacy without =0Astatic wicks.=0A=C2=A0=0ARegards=0A=C2= =A0=0AGary=0A=0A=0A --0-864519138-1294376089=:66551 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Gary,

=0A

I believe it is= fair to say that the majority of Legacy's are flying around without static= wicks. I only know of one that used to have them but they have been = removed. I am speaking of 199L, the demo Legacy that Lancair has been= using for years.

=0A

Art

=0A

=0AFrom: Linda and Gary Weeks <week= sy5@optusnet.com.au>
To:<= /B> lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Thu, January 6, 2011 9:12:52 PM
Subject: [LML] Legacy without Static Wicks

= =0A=0A=0A
=0A
G=E2=80=99Day All,
=0A

=0A
I am interested in hearing from anyone out there flying a= Lancair Legacy without having static wicks fitted.
=0A

=0A
I would like to hear what avionics eq= uipment you have installed and if it is affected at any stage.
=0A

=0A
Happy to hear from anyone = for or against the idea of flying the Legacy without static wicks.
=0A
=0A
Regards
=0A

=0A
Gary

=0A=0A --0-864519138-1294376089=:66551--