X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:24:34 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma06.mx.aol.com ([64.12.78.142] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.11) with ESMTP id 4648959 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:49:57 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.78.142; envelope-from=RWolf99@aol.com Received: from imo-da02.mx.aol.com (imo-da02.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.200]) by imr-ma06.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oBL3nF1k032603 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:49:15 -0500 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-da02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.f85.6909e0b (45492) for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:49:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtprly-me03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-me03.mx.aol.com [64.12.95.104]) by cia-mc07.mx.aol.com (v129.7) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMC077-b30f4d1023b33b0; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:49:10 -0500 Received: from webmail-d046 (webmail-d046.sim.aol.com [205.188.167.96]) by smtprly-me03.mx.aol.com (v129.5) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYME037-b30f4d1023b33b0; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:49:07 -0500 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Cowling Deformation X-Original-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:49:07 -0500 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-AOL-IP: 97.115.226.220 X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: rwolf99@aol.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CD6ED92725682B_1E58_1075_webmail-d046.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 33069-STANDARD Received: from 97.115.226.220 by webmail-d046.sysops.aol.com (205.188.167.96) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:49:07 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CD6ED92719807E-1E58-65E@webmail-d046.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: RWolf99@aol.com ----------MB_8CD6ED92725682B_1E58_1075_webmail-d046.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" <> Wow! Lorn, you're talking about the back section of the scoop deforming= upwards, I hope? I mean, you're not suggesting that the front of the cow= ling elevates 1.5 inches relative to the spinner? I can see how the scoop might deform near the back -- I just pushed on min= e with my hand and it deformed almost an inch. But I can't seem to make= it move significantly near the front. Please let us know if that's what you meant. - Rob ----------MB_8CD6ED92725682B_1E58_1075_webmail-d046.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"

<<When in flight, the bottom of my cowlin= g is compressed upwards by about 1.5" to 2". Make sure you do not have any= thing that this compression could effect.>>
 
Wow!  Lorn, you're talking about the= back section of the scoop deforming upwards, I hope?  I mean, you're= not suggesting that the front of the cowling elevates 1.5 inches relative= to the spinner?
 
I can see how the scoop might deform near= the back -- I just pushed on mine with my hand and it deformed almost an= inch.  But I can't seem to make it move significantly near the front= .
 
Please let us know if that's what you mean= t.
 
- Rob


----------MB_8CD6ED92725682B_1E58_1075_webmail-d046.sysops.aol.com--