X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 08:52:37 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.11) with ESMTP id 4647563 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:11:16 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.69; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=QEfbJ4+zdPw24abfwV8wP5+PgOCUhwyiY+VEy0RTEy8IZ/R/eTF07kKNnsi6GVp3; h=Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [216.57.118.85] (helo=[192.168.1.103]) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1PUX57-0000D2-Oo for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:10:41 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: [LML] Revised Fuel Probe Calibration Map (after Six Years) From: Colyn Case In-Reply-To: X-Original-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:10:41 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Original-Message-Id: <577DDCF9-6F85-4E05-A00A-A7FC512D6D74@earthlink.net> References: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da940b29e11d8a68cffd9fffde090666573c7350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 216.57.118.85 that kind of looks like the probe sagged in the middle. the ends are pretty close. On Dec 19, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Jeffrey Liegner, MD wrote: > Lancair ListServ, >=20 > FWIW: In my Lancair IVP, I have VMS fuel capacitance probes (AC = output) which interface with Pricnceton Electronics Interface units (AC = in, DC out) which communicates with my Chelton's EAU (originally made by = GRT). > =20 > I recently re-calibrated my fuel probes output through the Princeton = interface unit, as I wondered about calibration drift after six+ years. = Each tank holds 55 gallons, and the step-reading system is based on 10% = increments. >=20 > >=20 > As you can see, the output reading has changed over time, resulting in = a display error in fuel volume in the tank. This explains the = calculated Totalizer mismatch (and WARNING message) with the probe's = Fuel Quantity reading, as occassionally seen on long flights. An = example is when there was actually 44 gallons in the tank (ex, after = using 11 gallons per fuel flow sensor), the older fuel map told me there = was 38.5 gallons...you can understand the Totalizer error created by = this. >=20 > I simply post this in case others find it relevant or interesting. >=20 > Jeff L in New Jersey > LIVP >=20 >=20