X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 14:39:26 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from jrcda.com ([206.130.116.53] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.11) with ESMTPS id 4632212 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 09:08:55 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.130.116.53; envelope-from=hwasti@lm50.com Received: from [192.168.1.104] (207-170-226-183.static.twtelecom.net [207.170.226.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by jrcda.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oB7E8GPI026546 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 07:08:17 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <4CFE3FB7.60403@lm50.com> X-Original-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 06:07:51 -0800 From: Hamid Wasti User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Hydraulic hoses References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rick Titsworth wrote: > > However, your explanation may save them [NTSB] lots of trouble > attempting to determine the root cause. > In case people are not aware, Rick is being quite serious with this statement. The NTSB has used a pilot's postings to online groups (including LML) in their accident investigations and have quoted from them in the official report. I am personally not aware of the FAA using them in an enforcement action, but I would not be surprised if they already have or would one day. Regards, Hamid