X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 07:34:21 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-4576327@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <ronlaughlin@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-bw0-f52.google.com ([209.85.214.52] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10)
  with ESMTP id 4576103 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:05:07 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.214.52; envelope-from=ronlaughlin@gmail.com
Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so2727250bwz.25
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:04:30 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=XUFW01aEA2i5Fqju2Lwa01jjCooxB5yv1QYgQwNS0i7dINy7MIT6n/n+rAfgz37y4g
         jSjdCBEENpaIjpFZnGbivZghCrluZ7xomYQmfKNtypnXmlacaojN2kK+YN74c1RKXoJc
         H4AyGK6uxwpRzI2HPFrC+PoAWeywMNhvH2JuQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.76.207 with SMTP id d15mr2302662bkk.198.1289541870737;
 Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:04:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.58.205 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 22:04:30 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: ronlaughlin@hotmail.com
In-Reply-To: <list-4575381@logan.com>
References: <list-4575381@logan.com>
X-Original-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:04:30 -0600
X-Original-Message-ID: <AANLkTi=5qR6sWMkG9F6y0_+16km-dJiYNDuvVC2FQ_9G@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: iPad use in the cockpit
From: Ron Laughlin <ronlaughlin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I don't know if it's CYA or not but I've used mine in the mid-teens on
numerous occasions w/o any problems....so far anyway.
Ron



On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Chris Zavatson
<chris_zavatson@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Thanks for all the replies.
> One more question.=A0 The apple specs show maximum operating altitude of
> 10,000 feet.=A0 If there is a good technical reason for this, it would se=
em
> rather limiting for our=A0en-route use.=A0 The operating temperature is a=
lso
> kind of pushing the upper limit when on the ground=A0on hot summer days.=
=A0 The
> temperature issue can be somewhat controlled, but the altitude exposure n=
ot
> so much.=A0 Is this a CYA or other generic limit?
>
> Environmental requirements
>
> Operating temperature: 32=B0 to 95=B0 F (0=B0 to 35=B0=A0C)
> Nonoperating temperature: -4=B0 to 113=B0 F (-20=B0 to 45=B0=A0C)
> Relative humidity: 5% to 95% noncondensing
> Maximum operating altitude: 10,000 feet (3000 m)
>
> Chris Zavatson
>