X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 07:31:42 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma03.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.41] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.10) with ESMTP id 4575543 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:58:18 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.206.41; envelope-from=RWolf99@aol.com Received: from imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (imo-ma02.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.137]) by imr-ma03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oABJvZk8009862 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:57:35 -0500 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-ma02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.d48.78dc57d5 (43954) for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:57:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtprly-mb03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-mb03.mx.aol.com [64.12.207.150]) by cia-dd01.mx.aol.com (v129.5) with ESMTP id MAILCIADD013-5c784cdc4a9e372; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:57:23 -0500 Received: from webmail-m006 (webmail-m006.sim.aol.com [64.12.101.89]) by smtprly-mb03.mx.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYMB037-5c784cdc4a9e372; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:57:18 -0500 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Retrofitting a 360 X-Original-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:57:18 -0500 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-AOL-IP: 75.164.72.76 X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: rwolf99@aol.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CD4FF1C795E17F_1A88_4177_webmail-m006.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 32843-STANDARD Received: from 75.164.72.76 by webmail-m006.sysops.aol.com (64.12.101.89) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 14:57:18 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CD4FF1C793801E-1A88-1F1E@webmail-m006.sysops.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: RWolf99@aol.com ----------MB_8CD4FF1C795E17F_1A88_4177_webmail-m006.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Danny - Some thoguhts from a 360 builder (but not yet flying). 1) Canopy -- If you are considering retrofitting a forward hinged canopy= to a finished 360 with a parallelogram canopy, here are some things to co= nsider. The forward hinge canopy attaches to brackets which go into "pock= ets" in the aft face of the header tank. If the back face of the header= tank is flat, you will need to "make" pockets by hacking up the header ta= nk. That would be a real pain, in my opinion, but anything can be done.= There are instructions for doing this with the forward hinge canopy hard= ware. My 360 came with parallelogram canopy hardware but a "pocketed" hea= der tank, and I subsequently purchased the forward hinge hardware. So you= might luck out there and find a parallelogram canopy installation onto a= pocketed tank. If the plane does not have a header tank at all you've go= t a bigger problem -- no place to attach the brackets for the hinges. Reg= ardless of header tank configuration, you will have to reinforce the front= of the canopy with 80 feet of unidirectional carbon fiber. You may also= choose to trim the canopy sides to make them thinner and gain about an in= ch of shoulder room. This particular modification work should not be too= hard, but you'll trash the interior paint on the canopy. Not a biggie,= I think. You'll also need to cut a slot in the back rest for the handle= and affix nylon pivot blocks to the inside walls just behind the seat. = Plus cut slots into the rollover structure for the latches and make a hol= e in the side of the plane for the handle. Also cut holes in your glaresh= ield for the hinges. All is doable but I'm not sure I would bother. Gues= ses? $1000 for materials and parts and 250 hours labor. Plus paint. Jus= t a guess. 2) Long engine mount -- This will probably make maintenance a lot easier.= Will also move your CG forward and make it fly better. I think all you'= ll need to do is unbolt the mount, make sure the new mount fits in the old= holes, and move the engine and its accessories over. Then you'll need to= extend the cowling to fill the gap. As fiberglass work goes that's not= too bad. You will have to re-do the cowling fasteners, of course. And= you might need longer hoses in a couple of places, but that's just writin= g a check. Guesses? $500 for a new mount, $700 for materials including= new cowl fastener parts and new hoses, a weekend for the changeover and= 75 hours labor for extending the canopy and redoing the cowl fasteners.= Plus paint. 3) Landing gear -- I have long considered the Lancair landing gear to be= the weak link in the airplane. Tinkertoy struts supporting go-kart wheel= s and bicycle brakes. Okay, so maybe that's a little harsh but if you com= pare the Lancair gear to any certified airplane of the same or similar wei= ght and you see Twiggy supporting the Lancair and (fil in your favorite fe= male WWE start here) supporting the spam can. (wait, where was I? I lost= my train of thoguth for a moment) Oh, yes, and it's not just the gear --= the flaps are totally different as well. This is a huge modification whi= ch I would stay away from. But again, I know nothing about the outback ge= ar. Guesses? Megabucks for the parts and a year or two for the labor. (O= kay, maybe I exaggerate a little.) Hope this helps. - Rob Wolf Tucson AZ ----------MB_8CD4FF1C795E17F_1A88_4177_webmail-m006.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Danny -
 
Some thoguhts from a 360 builder (but not yet flying).
 
1)  Canopy -- If you are considering retrofitting a forward hing= ed canopy to a finished 360 with a parallelogram canopy, here are some thi= ngs to consider.  The forward hinge canopy attaches to brackets which= go into "pockets" in the aft face of the header tank.  If the back= face of the header tank is flat, you will need to "make" pockets by hacki= ng up the header tank.  That would be a real pain, in my opinion, but= anything can be done.  There are instructions for doing this with th= e forward hinge canopy hardware.  My 360 came with parallelogram cano= py hardware but a "pocketed" header tank, and I subsequently purchased the= forward hinge hardware.  So you might luck out there and find a para= llelogram canopy installation onto a pocketed tank.  If the plane doe= s not have a header tank at all you've got a bigger problem -- no pla= ce to attach the brackets for the hinges.  Regardless of header tank= configuration, you will have to reinforce the front of the canopy with 80= feet of unidirectional carbon fiber.  You may also choose to trim th= e canopy sides to make them thinner and gain about an inch of shoulder roo= m.  This particular modification work should not be too hard, but you= 'll trash the interior paint on the canopy.  Not a biggie, I think.&n= bsp; You'll also need to cut a slot in the back rest for the handle and af= fix nylon pivot blocks to the inside walls just behind the seat.  Plu= s cut slots into the rollover structure for the latches and make a hole in= the side of the plane for the handle.  Also cut holes in your glares= hield for the hinges.  All is doable but I'm not sure I would bother.=   Guesses?  $1000 for materials and parts and 250 hours labor.&n= bsp; Plus paint.  Just a guess.
 
2)  Long engine mount -- This will probably make maintenance a= lot easier.  Will also move your CG forward and make it fly better.&= nbsp; I think all you'll need to do is unbolt the mount, make sure the new= mount fits in the old holes, and move the engine and its accessories over= .  Then you'll need to extend the cowling to fill the gap.  As= fiberglass work goes that's not too bad.  You will have to re-do the= cowling fasteners, of course.  And you might need longer hoses in a= couple of places, but that's just writing a check.  Guesses? = $500 for a new mount, $700 for materials including new cowl fastener part= s and new hoses, a weekend for the changeover and 75 hours labor for= extending the canopy and redoing the cowl fasteners.  Plus paint.
 
3)  Landing gear -- I have long considered the Lancair landing= gear to be the weak link in the airplane.  Tinkertoy struts supporti= ng go-kart wheels and bicycle brakes.  Okay, so maybe that's a little= harsh but if you compare the Lancair gear to any certified airplane of th= e same or similar weight and you see Twiggy supporting the Lancair and (fi= l in your favorite female WWE start here) supporting the spam can. (wait,= where was I?  I lost my train of thoguth for a moment)  Oh, yes= , and it's not just the gear -- the flaps are totally different as well.&n= bsp; This is a huge modification which I would stay away from.  But= again, I know nothing about the outback gear. Guesses?  Megabucks fo= r the parts and a year or two for the labor.  (Okay, maybe I exaggera= te a little.)
 
Hope this helps.
 
- Rob Wolf
Tucson AZ
----------MB_8CD4FF1C795E17F_1A88_4177_webmail-m006.sysops.aol.com--