X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:06:23 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-gy0-f180.google.com ([209.85.160.180] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.2) with ESMTP id 4139580 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:25:18 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.160.180; envelope-from=bakercdb@gmail.com Received: by gyb11 with SMTP id 11so336497gyb.25 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:24:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=dZwcd03RMizodi9y4cHxe52o6a/aSWSy9YqYDWhHWkZ9s8QA1yee60+hyNQbk7U8sH Zq5nMLEelyXcyW8n41uS8wp5wma5cXxImAzu+5y5KqMU0QN1QulPfDp2GUGw1mYix4cM vMJdLrZVeRMXpQhLSiKfa/+IhkK7mqrWe98k8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.239.3 with SMTP id m3mr2005940ybh.79.1267237483009; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:24:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: X-Original-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 21:24:42 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <175557b91002261824q27f1c721kb5d6bc69939ab1cf@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Landing Light Comparison- HID vs LED vs Halogen From: Clark Baker X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 The easy choice-both. Leds on the tips (wig wag all the time like yours). Hid on the gear- they throw off SO much light - should be really nice in the flair and taxi. The best of both worlds. Then likely all LED in the not so distant future? On 2/26/10, Bill N5ZQ wrote: > Good test. So what's your final answer? For me, it's LEDs. > > Bill > > > > > -- Clark Baker mobile: + 1 917 558 5567 bakercdb@gmail.com