X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:56:39 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-da06.mx.aol.com ([205.188.169.203] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3.2) with ESMTP id 4100458 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:56:28 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.169.203; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from imo-da03.mx.aol.com (imo-da03.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.201]) by imr-da06.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o0RCtjW4002523 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:55:45 -0500 Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-da03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.5.) id q.cf6.6d95f435 (55720) for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:55:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtprly-dc01.mx.aol.com (smtprly-dc01.mx.aol.com [205.188.170.1]) by cia-md02.mx.aol.com (v127.7) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMD023-d2e94b6037c93bb; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:55:40 -0500 Received: from magic-d26.mail.aol.com (magic-d26.mail.aol.com [172.19.146.160]) by smtprly-dc01.mx.aol.com (v127.7) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDC018-d2e94b6037c93bb; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:55:37 -0500 From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <2a074.7dc3af95.389191c9@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:55:37 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Airspeed sensing switch /Auto gear extension / Engine out gear ... X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_2a074.7dc3af95.389191c9_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.5 sub 155 X-AOL-ORIG-IP: 67.175.242.202 X-AOL-IP: 172.19.146.160 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: Sky2high@aol.com --part1_2a074.7dc3af95.389191c9_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yeah, except at night. Grayhawk In a message dated 1/27/2010 4:47:32 A.M. Central Standard Time, troneill@charter.net writes: Good reminder, Bob. So, I don't have to put in an extra switch if I decide to belly-in wheels up. Just cut the master (and aux master) before slowing to 90 knots. Terrence. L235/320 N211AL On Jan 26, 2010, at 10:10 AM, bob mackey wrote: > I'm still not clear on why anyone would want gear extension to be automated > based on airspeed. If I have to do an engine out landing, I'll lower > the gear if > there is pavement and plenty of time. Otherwise, the belly will suffice. > > But if there is an automated system for some reason, and it needs to be > defeated before landing in a soybean field, then the master switch is as > good a place to defeat it as any. You were going to turn that off anyway, right? > -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html --part1_2a074.7dc3af95.389191c9_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yeah, except at night.

Grayhawk

In a message dated 1/27/2010 4:47:32 A.M. Central Standard Time,=20 troneill@charter.net writes:

Good=20 reminder, Bob.
So, I don't have to put in an extra switch if= I=20 decide to belly-in wheels up. Just cut the master (and aux master)= =20 before slowing to 90 knots.
Terrence. L235/320 N211AL

On Jan= 26,=20 2010, at 10:10 AM, bob mackey wrote:

> I'm still not clear on= why=20 anyone would want gear extension to be automated
> based on airspe= ed. If=20 I have to do an engine out landing, I'll lower
> the gear if
&g= t;=20 there is pavement and plenty of time. Otherwise, the belly will=20 suffice.
>
> But if there is an automated system for some= reason,=20 and it needs to be
> defeated before landing in a soybean field,= then=20 the master switch is as
> good a place to defeat it as any. You we= re=20 going to turn that off anyway, right?
>

--
For arch= ives=20 and unsub=20 http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

--part1_2a074.7dc3af95.389191c9_boundary--