Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:47:03 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-4100370@logan.com>
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.33.127.80; envelope-from=troneill@charter.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Airspeed sensing switch /Auto gear extension / Engine out gear down Issue!
From: Terrence O'Neill <troneill@charter.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-4096679@logan.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <list-4096679@logan.com>

Good reminder, Bob. =20
So, I don't have to put in an extra switch if I decide to belly-in =
wheels up.  Just cut the master (and aux master) before slowing to 90 =
knots.
Terrence. L235/320 N211AL

On Jan 26, 2010, at 10:10 AM, bob mackey wrote:

> I'm still not clear on why anyone would want gear extension to be =
automated
> based on airspeed. If I have to do an engine out landing, I'll lower
> the gear if
> there is pavement and plenty of time. Otherwise, the belly will =
suffice.
>=20
> But if there is an automated system for some reason, and it needs to =
be
> defeated before landing in a soybean field, then the master switch is =
as
> good a place to defeat it as any. You were going to turn that off =
anyway, right?
>=20