Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #54224
From: Wolfgang <Wolfgang@MiCom.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: Do-it-yourself AOA Project
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:07:32 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
I'm not trying to beat my chest and show how much I know. My desire is to bring solutions, not just criticism.
 
By fixing a specific part of a problem, one can not assume approval of the whole, that would be remiss let alone foolish.
 
I was addressing specific criticism of a specific design fault . . . . only.
 
Wolfgang

From: Brent Regan <brent@regandesigns.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: Do-it-yourself AOA Project
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:38:24 -0500
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Wolfgang writes:

<<<
A simple solution would be to have the 5V regulator with a heat sink feed the LED's. . . . . what I assumed in the first place.
 
I like offering a fix rather than just criticism.

>>>>

You are a smart guy. You can see the deficiencies in a design and correct them on the fly (npi), but not all builders have that capability. The problem with the LED power is more a symptom than the problem. It shows and incomplete understanding of the factors that go into a reliable design. There are a multitude of things wrong with the proposed design and the average builder should be aware of these things in the interest of safety. Hamid pointed out a few of the most egregious problems. The full list is much longer.

You would not build a device unless you plan to use it. If you use it you will come to rely on it. If you rely on it and it fails you will likely be in a worse (perhaps much worse) state than if you did not have the device in the first place.

This reasoning is why you want to avoid poorly designed and or poorly tested devices that may effect flight.

FYI, Hamid has been designing electronics for decades and certified avionics for 12 years. His designs range from simple communication repeaters to  complete, certified Pentium motherboards. His products are used by the likes of Cobham, Boeing, CMC Electronics, Rockwell Collins, Honeywell, Liquid Robotics, and on and on. He is wise enough to know that putting a Band-Aid on a massive blunt force head trauma will not fix the big picture. Likewise, offering a patch for the LED problem would be, de facto, approving of the balance of the design.

Do you think the balance if the design is reliable, fail-safe and unlikely to negatively effect flight? Consider your answer carefully as it will say a lot about your design skills.

Regards
Brent Regan
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster