Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #54016
From: <Sky2high@aol.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Fuel Planning
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:29:19 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Mark,
 
Nice try but no cigar.  Most aerobatic purpose aeroplanes have a relatively small fuel tank located near the axis of rotation for aerobatic purposes.  They also have other tanks which are only used to move about the country, not practice or compete.
 
A 300 series Lancair with a header that holds 9-11 gallons will not affect the spar loading since the original design has the engine fed from the header.  Having an unnecessary 35 gallons in the wing does add to the load and for what purpose.  A smaller amount can't be reliably pumped into the header during maneuvers that unport the wing pickup.
 
Grayhawk
 
In a message dated 12/27/2009 11:51:48 A.M. Central Standard Time, mwsletten@gmail.com writes:

Grayhawk,

 

On the other hand, weight in the fuselage, as opposed to the wing itself, puts more stress on the spar. Life is full of little trade offs…

 

--Mark Sletten

 

From: sky2high@aol.com [mailto:sky2high@aol.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 26, 2009 8:49 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Fuel Planning

 

GT,

  

On behalf of those 300 series pilots that perform aerobatics, going out to compete or practice with only a full header is prudent as fuel in the wings may upset the balance of some maneuvers.

 

Grayhawk

 

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster