X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 07:50:16 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nskntmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com ([61.9.168.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.3c4) with ESMTP id 4034716 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:22:16 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=61.9.168.149; envelope-from=frederickmoreno@bigpond.com Received: from nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com ([124.178.51.22]) by nskntmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20091222112138.UJLL28618.nskntmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com> for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:21:38 +0000 Received: from Razzle ([124.178.51.22]) by nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20091222112137.WGAQ24930.nskntotgx03p.mx.bigpond.com@Razzle> for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 11:21:37 +0000 From: "Frederick Moreno" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: FW: [LML] Re: Intumescent firwall coating X-Original-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:21:21 +0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <017a01ca82f8$e59c5a90$b0d50fb0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_017B_01CA833B.F3BF9A90" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcqCL2JvoIIriTFDTIuivBe4SC3H2QAyRMNA Content-Language: en-au X-RPD-ScanID: Class unknown; VirusThreatLevel unknown, RefID str=0001.0A150203.4B30ABC1.010C,ss=1,fgs=0 X-SIH-MSG-ID: qR40ENXuCkKhkDE4gja+bFg2l1K70SNytt9NBYd6+kVFXEfBvd/fRMK9dqJfw4z2sHsZJm7QbXEiYbzlXIXTs9OzKaxTWrDQ3Q== This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_017B_01CA833B.F3BF9A90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =20 I couldn't find the cold face temp for the msds but here it is for durablan= ket:=20 http://www.fiberfrax.com/files/Fiberfrax-Durablanket-Mat.pdf =20 2" looks like it would reliably do the job.=20 =20 WHOA! You are looking at STEADY STATE heat transfer calculations filled wi= th assumptions buried in =E2=80=9Cindustry standard=E2=80=9D calculation me= thodologies. The transient heat transfer effects are MUCH different. Y= ou have to define the problem carefully. I suggest research in aircraft fi= rewall requirements which probably require 10 minute survival (guess) whic= h is a much different transient problem. =20 Fred ------=_NextPart_000_017B_01CA833B.F3BF9A90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 

I couldn't find the cold face temp for the msds but here it is= for durablanket:

 

2" looks like it would reliably do the job= .

 

WHOA!=C2=A0 You are looking at STEADY STATE heat transfer calculations filled with assumptions buried in =E2=80=9Cindustry standard= =E2=80=9D calculation methodologies.=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0The transient heat=C2=A0 transfer effects = are MUCH different.=C2=A0 You have to define the problem carefully.=C2=A0 I suggest research in aircraft = firewall requirements which=C2=A0 probably require 10 minute survival (guess) which = is a much different transient problem.

 

Fred

------=_NextPart_000_017B_01CA833B.F3BF9A90--