X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:03:31 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta41.charter.net ([216.33.127.83] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3887819 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:22:17 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.33.127.83; envelope-from=troneill@charter.net Received: from imp10 ([10.20.200.10]) by mta41.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20091016082142.MDMS27630.mta41.charter.net@imp10>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:21:42 -0400 Received: from mp13 ([209.225.8.243]) by imp10 with smtp.charter.net id tLMi1c0045Ed3mR05LMiCl; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:21:42 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=fLuM78UsAAAA:8 a=6Tx3Fc5VAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=mfPBzcjHowhDEeXwr3wA:9 a=XjuyosF-6qMPQolZT74A:7 a=cwD5a_iwZhtHU1Jze6LqHtx2_SAA:4 a=3jk_M6PjnjYA:10 a=1lAk_FggOLUA:10 X-Original-Message-ID: <20091016042142.SO95S.7110680.root@mp13> X-Original-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 1:21:42 -0700 From: X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] stalling a plane X-Original-Cc: marv@lancair.net In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sensitivity: Normal X-Originating-IP: from 75.132.241.174 by ssomail.charter.net; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 4:21:42 -0400 Amen to that for Bill. =20 After first learning in Cubs and Porterfields and Aeroncas from some WWII = jocks in 1946... with many, many stalls from all sorts of entries, and espe= cially right after takeoff... and a few years later after 4 years flying Na= vy SNJs and P2Vs, I thought I understood stalls. Then I bought Waco's last= plane and began modifying it, and realized I needed to know what it was do= ing afterwards, so I made myself a simple AOA vane and put it on the left w= ing in my field of vision. After spending a hour playing with it in slow f= light I learned I didn't really understand the pilot-stall relationship... = and had a ball after stallingit to mark the stall angle on the AOA,a nd the= n flying around for an hour with the wing just a degree or so below stall, = and with the wing first stalled and then quickly unstalled, over and over..= . and in all sorts of attitudes. And I realized that at high stalled angle= s I was also stalling the horizontal tail! ... I tufted it to confirm that.= I noted the slow nose-down pitch when the H-tail stalled. So then I adde= d slots to the H-tail (to delay it's stall another 10-15 degrees) and found= I could then get very fast unstalling pitch-dpwn from steep stalls. It ha= d never occurred to me before about the H-tail stalling. Anyway, these are a few of my comments about stalling and AOAs,a nd why I h= ave put AOA vanes on every one of my planes since. On my 235/320 I read all the CAFE and other pro-test pilot reports and note= d the slow unstalling reported, so as I was finishing it up (this kit No. 1= 1 with the small tail) I designed and added my 'spats', which are 2-positi= on slots, to the H-tail, and they seem to preserve the unstalling ability o= f the H-tail... perhaps at the cost of a few mph cruise. Still testing bot= h. I agree with Bill's comments about eh FAA not 'getting it' about stalls, ha= ving talked to their guys in local and regional offices, and even to the ma= in safety guy many years ago (under Najeeb Halaby)... They want a gage to = read out on the panel, where you should NOT be looking during base and fina= l approach... and they're not impressed by the Navy' switch to AOAs in 1956= , cutting their landing accident rate in half the very first year. I'mnow personally leery when flying without an AOA, but with one on the wi= ng don;t think twice about steep banks on final, watching the AOA. No swea= t. This is probably not of muich interest to the very experienced pilots who k= now their planes... but maybe the new guys flying these 'glass slippers' w= ill be interested, and consider adding an AOA. Terrence L235/320 N211AL ---- marv@lancair.net wrote:=20 >=20 > Posted for "Bill Maddox" : >=20 > =20 > I see this as a problem not with the plane but the pilots that fly it .= Some > of the past statements that are listed in several of the write inns are > correct and some are total bunk . I see a lack of training come from t= he > faa instruction in training new students as well . When I left the > instruction faze of my life I saw the mandates starting to come down to= no > spin training required for students in training around the late 70's . = If > you have a flight instructor that trained you on spins it probably was = in > the 70's or it was an instructor like myself that believed in the whole > training package to flight . I also see a lot of very low time pilots f= lying > these planes . Also pilots that took anywhere from 3 to 8 or more years= to > build and then fly there plane without touching a stick . This is an is= sue > that needs to be trained in high performance single engine planes befor= e > getting into the lancair planes or best train in another lancair . Not = to go > out and rent a 172 and get some re-fresher I F R training . I can't > understand the no brainer of not having an aoa or a stall device in the > plane . As pilots we were teethed on this device from the start of our > training and now we get into a clean minimal drag plane without this st= all > devices . I don't understand the thinking of some of you pilots . I wou= ldn't > fly a plane without a stall devise in it .Most of you came from 60 k fi= nal > approach planes that don't have the correct approach speeds that the > lancair has . > =20 > I have stalled every plane I flew . from the C 150 to the B 757 . When= you > try the stalls in your plane you must have a forward cg in your plane a= nd > prefer it to be on the forward edge of the envelope . I stalled the lan= cair > for the first time around 1990 with Don Getz over Redmond ,Or after > climbing to 10 k . I stalled it straight ahead in a clean stall with no > power several times in a row and several in a turn as well . In all th= e > stalls the nose dropped off and I added power and recovered nicely , no > tight turns just a smooth recovery . Rudder control was not inputted f= or it > wasn't needed This was done in 409L after the new main gear box was put= in > it I believe before the flight . Rigging the plane correctly is a mus= t as > stated in previous statements as well . I really think engine out train= ing > is a must for the lancair as well . Sink rates and picking out a spot f= or a > successful landing is essential . . Faa doesn't have a clue and probabl= y > care less and for them to make statements is not there business . I fee= l we > as builders and pilots need to balance our flying and building skills t= o > build a better plane and have a proficient pilot in the plane he or she= is > flying and not wait to have a government agency try to tell us somethin= g we > all ready know Bill > =20 >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml