X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [71.42.21.121] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.2.16) with HTTP id 3887260 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:50:39 -0400 From: marv@lancair.net Subject: stalling a plane To: X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.2.16 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:50:39 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <6E909254C0F44374B415F7E2DBDCED7F@VALUEDE91AB895> References: <6E909254C0F44374B415F7E2DBDCED7F@VALUEDE91AB895> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1;format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Bill Maddox" : I see this as a problem not with the plane but the pilots that fly it . Some of the past statements that are listed in several of the write inns are correct and some are total bunk . I see a lack of training come from the faa instruction in training new students as well . When I left the instruction faze of my life I saw the mandates starting to come down to no spin training required for students in training around the late 70's . If you have a flight instructor that trained you on spins it probably was in the 70's or it was an instructor like myself that believed in the whole training package to flight . I also see a lot of very low time pilots flying these planes . Also pilots that took anywhere from 3 to 8 or more years to build and then fly there plane without touching a stick . This is an issue that needs to be trained in high performance single engine planes before getting into the lancair planes or best train in another lancair . Not to go out and rent a 172 and get some re-fresher I F R training . I can't understand the no brainer of not having an aoa or a stall device in the plane . As pilots we were teethed on this device from the start of our training and now we get into a clean minimal drag plane without this stall devices . I don't understand the thinking of some of you pilots . I wouldn't fly a plane without a stall devise in it .Most of you came from 60 k final approach planes that don't have the correct approach speeds that the lancair has . I have stalled every plane I flew . from the C 150 to the B 757 . When you try the stalls in your plane you must have a forward cg in your plane and prefer it to be on the forward edge of the envelope . I stalled the lancair for the first time around 1990 with Don Getz over Redmond ,Or after climbing to 10 k . I stalled it straight ahead in a clean stall with no power several times in a row and several in a turn as well . In all the stalls the nose dropped off and I added power and recovered nicely , no tight turns just a smooth recovery . Rudder control was not inputted for it wasn't needed This was done in 409L after the new main gear box was put in it I believe before the flight . Rigging the plane correctly is a must as stated in previous statements as well . I really think engine out training is a must for the lancair as well . Sink rates and picking out a spot for a successful landing is essential . . Faa doesn't have a clue and probably care less and for them to make statements is not there business . I feel we as builders and pilots need to balance our flying and building skills to build a better plane and have a proficient pilot in the plane he or she is flying and not wait to have a government agency try to tell us something we all ready know Bill