|
|
|
Paul,
Ahhhh, See the attached engine performance chart. HP does have a
relationship to the product of RPM and MAP, but note that relationship
must change when running LOP vs ROP. Why? Because of the
variable gearing achieved thru a constant speed prop (by
definition). Because of the untouched prop control, rpm
remains "constant" and the pitch bite is reduced (AOA reduced) producing
less lift (forward thrust delivered). Thus, airspeed is reduced. On
a NA engine using ram induction air, the MAP may be slightly reduced when the
LOP operation airspeed is also reduced from the loss of thrust HP - even though
the throttle position is unchanged.
Maybe someone using a fixed pitch prop can comment on the loss of RPM when
going from ROP to LOP operation.
Scott Krueger
AKA Grayhawk Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 Normally Aspirated Aurora,
IL (KARR)
In a message dated 10/9/2009 9:09:14 A.M. Central
Daylight Time, paul@tbm700.com writes:
I think
the flaw in that argument is the GPH per HP for a specific regime (ROP versus
LOP) as your specific fuel consumption will change depending on that setting.
Your HP should be directly proportional to RPM and MP at any mixture. I
think I'm correct in that last statement regardless of whether the engine is
ROP or LOP. When I ran the TSIO-520NB with GAMI the procedure would be
to bump up the MP to keep the desired HP (65%, 70% or whatever you choose).
You have to bring the MP back up as the fuel flow drops off.
So, I would pick your desired power setting for LOP ops (say 65% for
talking purposes) and get the MP and RPM for that power setting. When
you go LOP work towards bringing the MP back up to maintain your target power.
That is what I recall for the GAMIs so I would be interested if that
might be what was being taught more recently. As I said in an earlier
posting, the only problem with high altitude turbo ops LOP was the need to
bump up the MP to keep the wastegate from bootstrapping. Others may need
higher MP for pressurization but I never experienced that in the twin.
Hope that all makes sense.
Paul Miller
Calgary (Legacy)
On 2009-10-08, at 6:13 PM, Isaac Heizer wrote:
My ES-P
has a TSIO-550E with GAMI injectors, and i've recently been through
advancedpilot's web LOP course. But I'm still unclear on at least one
point.
My TSIO-550E will happily run at 17.5 GPH at a MP of any of
30, 31, 32 (among others). All cylinders remain below 380, and TIT is
reasonable.
My understanding is multiplying 14.7 x GPH yields HP, in
this case 73.5% power
Is it 73% power no matter how I set the MP, so
long as temperatures remain in control? If that's true, why would I
select one MP over another (realizing I can't run wide open
throttle)?
=
|
|