X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:07:47 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTP id 3879737 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:07:23 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.66; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=hw96VjuWbDuUY1R6wBdIR+TwwOUvcaYTTJOqLjfYBwWY8oYTyFX+Ctqiw9pQxL5j; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [216.57.118.63] (helo=ccaselt3) by elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Mw4sZ-000105-P6 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:06:47 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <03db01ca4885$27f63ea0$8d01a8c0@nvidia.com> From: "Colyn Case at earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: High #2 CHT on a IVP X-Original-Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 22:06:46 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_03D8_01CA4863.A09AC460" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3598 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da9409ab0c1e554f8c527bc1cdb1d9520c263350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 216.57.118.63 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_03D8_01CA4863.A09AC460 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable right. flooding was my point. =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: farnsworth=20 To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 8:13 PM Subject: [LML] Re: High #2 CHT on a IVP Colyn, =20 "not recommended for low altitude the first time" I'm not sure where the logic is in that statement as it relates to a = low fuel flow problem. If your fuel flow is low enough that temperatures = are a problem, then increasing the fuel flow to the engine is the = solution to the problems that are caused when the engine is NOT getting = enough fuel. It doesn't make any difference what the altitude is.=20 =20 The statement only makes sense if turning on the high boost pump would = flood the engine. However, my comment was clearly directed to the = resolution of problems caused by LOW fuel flow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!=20 =20 Been there, done that, more than once. =20 Lynn Farnsworth Super Legacy #235 TSIO-550 Powered Race #44 =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_03D8_01CA4863.A09AC460 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
right. flooding was my point.  =
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 farnsworth
Sent: Thursday, October 08, = 2009 8:13=20 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: High #2 CHT = on a=20 IVP

Colyn,

 

=93not recommended for = low altitude=20 the first time=94


I=92m = not sure=20 where the logic is in that statement as it relates to a low fuel flow = problem.=20 If your fuel flow is low enough that temperatures are a problem, then=20 increasing the fuel flow to the engine is the solution to the problems = that=20 are caused when the engine is NOT getting enough fuel. It doesn=92t = make any=20 difference what the altitude is.

 

The = statement only=20 makes sense if turning on the high boost pump would flood the engine. = However,=20 my comment was clearly directed to the resolution of problems caused = by LOW=20 fuel flow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Been there, = done=20 that, more than once.

 

Lynn=20 Farnsworth

Super = Legacy=20 #235

TSIO-550=20 Powered

Race=20 #44

 

 

= ------=_NextPart_000_03D8_01CA4863.A09AC460--