X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:13:29 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from n12.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.125.209] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with SMTP id 3878578 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:23:58 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.191.125.209; envelope-from=mcmess1919@yahoo.com Received: from [68.142.200.225] by n12.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Oct 2009 05:23:22 -0000 Received: from [68.142.201.252] by t6.bullet.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Oct 2009 05:23:22 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp413.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Oct 2009 05:23:22 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 439758.99971.bm@omp413.mail.mud.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 11181 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2009 05:23:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language:x-cr-hashedpuzzle:x-cr-puzzleid; b=5seWVwcMH1szSZQZwUCcUmPNUJJegdfGqcN81FPvpPT6+hTVPiukpppfwiYmqJF7OMNgSo+z359u+HZbWyzpGTOYg2hpsBnoYka7OZC9E7iqXoJTTz1deW/EBz/1TKUUNVgUoG4t0a4lWY+NAWrC75HAOD2BDwBWhutpU7166ss= ; Received: from c-67-161-162-21.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (mcmess1919@67.161.162.21 with login) by smtp126.plus.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 07 Oct 2009 22:23:21 -0700 PDT X-Yahoo-SMTP: rK4i7HqswBC7mDE8.sOiWQeO4CeReXc- X-YMail-OSG: muBvEfEVM1lOrONivgrTcmrrUZYa6pwLzThzTtawIm8Fpb42pX8swkgBrZy54gQt3NYXG_QsJQyxVWzeui5FCrQEtAb.nOKN0dsPqbOifRPXpw8Q.eJwO.EIkPBy8R7NhlrrtRi75csKo67C7CRnxsq3yc8xUl.uR3stqOIigsiTRLAum19LS6daSSh3FilyklTC5OdZBjC_QShZFaMS8_fwBdeSv7i3AdKFTttiYUBLKQT18M6GJiiBeWuEDPAa X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: "Steve Colwell" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: LNC2 O-320D1F 1" Pull Back X-Original-Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:23:21 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <000e01ca47d7$73e998b0$5bbcca10$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcpHpEFYPz3PdNfHRz6KlOtc8vx+8AAMRd3w Content-Language: en-us x-cr-hashedpuzzle: AFT1 A4E0 ETth FHa3 FoDs FoQ0 GRlj HKAS HQ2s Hwm+ Hycg IOti IdIw KX7t LHFo LWJA;1;bABtAGwAQABsAGEAbgBjAGEAaQByAG8AbgBsAGkAbgBlAC4AbgBlAHQA;Sosha1_v1;7;{9226BA29-CAC8-460C-9AA6-D54E0DD64115};bQBjAG0AZQBzAHMAMQA5ADEAOQBAAHkAYQBoAG8AbwAuAGMAbwBtAA==;Thu, 08 Oct 2009 05:23:17 GMT;TABOAEMAMgAgAE8ALQAzADIAMABEADEARgAgADEAIgAgAFAAdQBsAGwAIABCAGEAYwBrAA== x-cr-puzzleid: {9226BA29-CAC8-460C-9AA6-D54E0DD64115} The GAMI folks recommend trying carb heat to improve mixture distribution and atomization (think flathead Ford V8 heat riser). The Ellison Throttle Body booth at OSH some years ago had a video of the improved atomization of their product compared to a carburetor. The carb looked like a clogged lawn sprinkler with droplet size and pattern changing all over the place as the throttle was closed. Heat might be worth a try. Steve Colwell