Return-Path: Received: from goose.prod.itd.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.18]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2000 23:07:07 -0400 Received: from computer (pool0890.cvx31-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net [209.179.149.125]) by goose.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA28051; Fri, 28 Apr 2000 20:12:31 -0700 (PDT) From: "Skip Slater" To: "J. N. Cameron" , "Lancair List" Subject: RE: TSIO-550 for the ES? Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 20:12:01 -0700 Message-ID: Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <003401bfb11f$57159d00$71b188ce@pavilion> X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> I agree with Jim's assessment: While turbo normalizing the ES would be useful for some of us, turbo charging it to 350 hp as the TSIO 550 does seems a bit of overkill unless you plan to routinely fly out of high elevation airports and need the power. I know that's been a factor for at least one builder I know. It's an expensive proposition, to be sure. If higher altitudes and speeds are all you're after, I think your TSIO-550 should be hung on a IV or IV-P. The same engine on either of the retracts would give you about 100 kts over a Super ES. To fly the ES another 20-25 kts above what you'd get from a 300 hp engine is pushing the envelope a bit and as Jim said, CG becomes a lot more critical. The Super ES is already overpowered compared to most of the competition. To add the steroids a turbo represents could be dangerous if you're not careful. That's my .02 worth. Skip Slater IO-540 ES in progress >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>