X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 22:02:13 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from asp-3.reflexion.net ([205.237.99.178] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with SMTP id 3876959 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:50:52 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.237.99.178; envelope-from=cberland@systems3.net Received: (qmail 20652 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2009 23:50:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO asp-3.reflexion.net) (127.0.0.1) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with SMTP; 6 Oct 2009 23:50:13 -0000 Received: by asp-3.reflexion.net (Reflexion email security v5.60.10) with SMTP; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:50:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 20624 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2009 23:50:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO remote.systems3.net) (98.172.79.178) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 6 Oct 2009 23:50:13 -0000 Received: from S3SBS08SERVER.Systems3.local ([fe80::6077:364b:fa39:c71b]) by S3SBS08SERVER.Systems3.local ([fe80::6077:364b:fa39:c71b%10]) with mapi; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:50:13 -0700 From: Craig Berland X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List X-Original-Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 16:50:11 -0700 Subject: [LML] Re: High #2 CHT on a IVP Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: High #2 CHT on a IVP Thread-Index: AcpGq7GyZwUallSgQO6yjwi2LoHbLQAM0pAA X-Original-Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D7A6B5700A0803448C27264F1F5387362298C733S3SBS08SERVERSy_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_D7A6B5700A0803448C27264F1F5387362298C733S3SBS08SERVERSy_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dan, In my opinion on the rich side of peak, if your TIT's are 1300 to 1350= degF, then the engine should cool. If the below fuel rate gives 1400 to 1= 450...maybe it will cool. Above that ....not likely. Craig Berland I checked the fuel flow at 31.5" and 2500 rpm. It was 29.8 g/h. Would the= difference between the suggested 32 g/h and my 29.8 make enough difference= to cause my problem? Dan --_000_D7A6B5700A0803448C27264F1F5387362298C733S3SBS08SERVERSy_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Dan, In my opinion on the rich side of peak, if your TIT’s are 1300 to 135= 0 degF, then the engine should cool.  If the below fuel rate gives 1400 = to 1450…maybe it will cool.  Above that ….not likely.<= span style=3D'font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>

Craig Berland

 =

I checked the fuel flow at 31.5" and 2500 rpm.  It was 29.8 g/h.&nb= sp; Would the difference between the suggested 32 g/h and my 29.8 make enough difference to cause my problem? Dan

 

--_000_D7A6B5700A0803448C27264F1F5387362298C733S3SBS08SERVERSy_--