|
|
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
<< Lancair Builders' Mail List >>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Fellow Lancair builders,
My $ 0.02 worth, I don't see much distinction between managing the fuel in
the header tank vs. switching between wing tanks, other than possibly doing
it more often with the header. Everything I have ever flown, with the
exception of high wing Cessna's, required some form of fuel management.
I have decided to not use the header tank because; 1. the wing tanks
(extended) will provide more than sufficient fuel for my purposes (3 hours
with IFR reserve), 2. I don't like the idea of having the fuel in front of
me, 3. this system is actually very simple (I obtained the design from Mark
at Lancair), and 4. I am mounting the hydraulic pump, battery, and
electrical distribution on the aft side of the firewall, which should
provide a forward C.G. and has better access than the aft fuselage.
Seems like this is a choice of builder preference and what one wants to do
with the plane.
Best regards,
Thomas
N361TR building slowly but surely
LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html
Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair
Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com.
|
|