X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:19:55 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail-out1.fuse.net ([216.68.8.175] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.15) with ESMTP id 3761377 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:39:49 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.68.8.175; envelope-from=dreagan@fuse.net X-Original-Return-Path: X-CNFS-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=ommrXN_R6ZesDIOAskkA:9 a=Hs4Nl2hfHspTcevuiFhe_FpCoDwA:4 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: gwout1 smtp.mail=dreagan@fuse.net; spf=unknown Received-SPF: error (gwout1: 208.102.196.40 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of fuse.net Received: from [208.102.196.40] ([208.102.196.40:50304] helo=D45LWMF1) by gwout1 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.37 r(28805/28810M)) with ESMTP id 89/8F-24823-FAA3F5A4; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:35:28 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <001a01ca0622$a8bfd780$fdc8a8c0@D45LWMF1> From: "Dan Reagan" X-Original-To: , "Janie & Ed Smith" <2luv2fly@cox.net> References: Subject: Re: Retractable Step IV-P X-Original-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:35:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 My experience with the step after much time spent trying to make it work 100% is the following: At 120 knots and level it works. At 130 knots it does not work At 110 knots it does not work At 120 knots in a non level attitude it does not work. Some times ATC just doesn't understand my step dilemma. I'm still working on it. Dan Reagan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Janie & Ed Smith" <2luv2fly@cox.net> To: Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 12:47 PM Subject: Retractable Step IV-P > "I've done it alone many times, several times just trying to figure a way > to make the "retractable" step actually work, before I finally gave up and > disconnected the cable and just locked it down." > > > John, > > The retractable step has been quite an "opportunity" for us as well. They > certainly didn't put their "best man" on the engineering and design for > the step. > > There are many reasons why the step doesn't work, but the main reason ours > didn't extend with the gear was because the spring just didn't seem to be > quite strong enough to overcome the resistance of the aerodynamics under > the wing. I felt like the air flow under the wing was a contributor to > the step staying in the retracted position because every time we put the > airplane on jacks and cycled the gear - everything worked perfectly! The > step would fall down and only take a "nudge" to get it into the locked > position. My thoughts were that the wind load would push it to the down & > locked position, so I concentrated on getting the step to make that > initial movement to the down position. > > I found a company in Norfolk, VA that specializes in custom springs and I > had them make a spring for me that was about 30% stronger. Right away, we > noticed an improvement because the step would extend, but only at about > 100 kts. Anything above that speed resulted in the step being on the > wrong side of the gear. Eventually, after 4 tries of different spring > sizes, we now have a step that extend @ 140 kts - just about every time. > The only down side to all of this is that the custom one-of-a-kind springs > cost $40. each. Of course, in the whole scheme of things - that is a small > cost for the convenience of having a step. Like the A/C that Jeff was > talking about - - it sure is nice and Janie (better half) likes it, so > there "ain't" no problem with the cost!! You know the old story > about Mamma being happy! > > Tailwinds, > > Ed Smith > N9JE > Chesapeake, VA > > > > > >