X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:50:45 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.234] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3756593 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:42:07 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.198.234; envelope-from=mdpilot982@gmail.com Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so709985rvf.7 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:41:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; b=h489/nmm6s98vs6cbt01aYvfAWI7L875K8VglYFCq8/vHaBjFTG7vQ8a+n8HsC9A6v 41sKKHg32nC275iPjSJfQ7Sza6F4KR5+Bc7SK0RNa6DHgbbUI2lFx7WccpCJ/KHb2Zxe iRLYc0QDLb6riX5OJ2bA5TT1Tr1pJDUQAZAGE= Received: by 10.141.3.15 with SMTP id f15mr3441370rvi.108.1247542892355; Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:41:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from DRSMITH (c-75-72-249-193.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [75.72.249.193]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm2242210rvb.42.2009.07.13.20.41.30 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:41:31 -0700 (PDT) From: "Michael D. Smith" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: X-Original-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 22:41:32 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <001b01ca0434$fc149be0$f43dd3a0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001C_01CA040B.133E93E0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcoEJG5WLMzyFc6DQsmBNZrB6prMQgAD53IQ Content-Language: en-us This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01CA040B.133E93E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Craig, No kidding on this one. If I paid some professional to do a task and he represented himself as the pro and willingly took on the job and the contract was that he would do it then he is responsible. If the job requires certain skills and equipment then it is up to him to apply the standard. Sorry, no complex interpretation here. Michael Smith From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Craig Gainza Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 8:43 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: You have got to be kidding me! ------=_NextPart_000_001C_01CA040B.133E93E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Craig,

 

No kidding on this one.  If I paid some professional = to do a task and he represented himself as the pro and willingly took on the = job and the contract was that he would do it then he is  responsible.  = If the job requires certain skills and equipment then it is up to him to apply = the standard.  Sorry, no complex interpretation = here.

 

 

Michael Smith

From:= Lancair = Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Craig Gainza
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 8:43 PM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re:

 

<if Lancair or the = agent of Lancair  were setting out to do an off site inspection prudence = would suggest they were required in fact to assure the jacks and lifting = mechanism of whatever type and the people involved were competent>

You have got to be kidding me!  =

 =

------=_NextPart_000_001C_01CA040B.133E93E0--