Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #52141
From: Colyn Case at earthlink <colyncase@earthlink.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] L IVP on jacks
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:32:09 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Is it true that the tail tie down is stronger than the hstab - in case something does fall and a lot of weight ends up on the tail?
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 5:51 PM
Subject: [LML] L IVP on jacks

Bill
sorry to hear of your misfortune with the inspection.
Something that may be of help for those putting their
planes on jacks in the future. Along with the jacks and engine hoist I use a tail support that stops the tail from
swinging back and forth( which makes it more probable
the plane will come off the jacks). The support consists
of two 10'  2x4s with a 2' piece across the top to form a
T put carpet on the cross member, an eye screw 2' from
the bottom of each T. Take a cargo strap( I use a second
for backup) to connect the eye screws, put the top of the
T under either side of the horizontal stab. As the plane is
jack up use the cargo strap to keep the T's snug under the
stab. This setup will keep the tail from swinging back and
forth. Don't forget to loosen this as you lower the plane. Bill
yours is the only experience I have heard about the inspection, not a store to instill confidence. If you have an
inspection and don't provide any assistance would they
accept responsibility for damage and repair.
Art     
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster