X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 08:53:21 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from QMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.48] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3754193 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:54:26 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=76.96.30.48; envelope-from=jimauman@comcast.net Received: from OMTA01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.11]) by QMTA05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Eqau1c0030EPchoA5qtscK; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 02:53:52 +0000 Received: from OFFICE ([98.228.183.52]) by OMTA01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Eqtq1c00118ElD68MqtqTn; Sun, 12 Jul 2009 02:53:51 +0000 From: "Jim Auman" X-Original-To: , References: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: New nose strut X-Original-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:53:24 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0048_01CA0272.04C66A80" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Thread-Index: AcoCYNUOlQUa03uLQlO/0WffI3Bo0AAOux5Q This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0048_01CA0272.04C66A80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks Guys, I am glad to hear why the differences exist, and how they got that way. Jim _____ From: Sky2high@aol.com [mailto:Sky2high@aol.com] Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 10:49 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: New nose strut Jim, Older struts (I can't remember the year of change - maybe 1996?) did not have a self centering mechanism. This is why you will see older 200-300 series planes with a bail around the back of the wheel - to help straighten out and stow the nose gear if it was not centered when retracted. Lancair provided an upgrade service to modify older struts with the centering mechanism and, after such modification, some owners cut off the bail leaving only an inch or two fastened to the fork to act as a stop for the flat side of the axle bushing. Others, like myself, left the bail in place out of nostalgia. The self centering function is not an absolute necessity as long as one takes of fairly straight and the shimmy dampener is working so that the wheel could be jammed into the well. Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 Aurora, IL (KARR) In a message dated 7/10/2009 6:50:42 A.M. Central Daylight Time, jimauman@comcast.net writes: -----Original Message----- From: troneill@charter.net [mailto:troneill@charter.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 10:16 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: New nose strut Hi Grayhawk, Snip> Terrance Wrote: "The strut does not center- lock when the shaft is fully extended." The Strut is supposed to be centered when fully extended. If it is not or is not able it is wrong, and unsafe in the retraction cycle. Not what it was designed to do. Take the strut off and, or get it to someone willing to verify its internal integrity. Something else is terribly wrong. Has Lancair gone through your strut? My strut has been trouble free. (4 years and 200 hours in my care.) I have had tire pressures at 30-35 psi and not a hint of imbalance or shimmy on the CHEN SHIN/ ESCO combination. Jim Auman Snip> Terrence O'Neill aka Redhand L235/320 N211AL Still grappling with the fuel slowscan 201B, but am cleared to fly 40 hrs etc. in my test area. ---- Sky2high@aol.com wrote: > I don't think ESCO went out of business, maybe just the business of > experimental aircraft struts.... > > _http://www.escocorp.com/locations.html_ > (http://www.escocorp.com/locations.html) > > Grayhawk > > > In a message dated 7/6/2009 7:46:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > cfi@instructor.net writes: > > It's my understanding that ESCO went out of business. > > -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html _____ Looking for love this summer? Find it now on AOL Personals. ------=_NextPart_000_0048_01CA0272.04C66A80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks Guys, I am glad to hear why = the differences exist, and how they got that = way.

 

Jim

 

From: = Sky2high@aol.com [mailto:Sky2high@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, July 10, = 2009 10:49 AM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: = New nose strut

 

Jim,

 

=

Older struts (I can't remember the = year of change - maybe 1996?) did not have a self centering mechanism.  = This is why you will see older 200-300 series planes with a bail around the back = of the wheel - to help straighten out and stow the nose gear if it was not = centered when retracted.  Lancair provided an upgrade service to modify = older struts with the centering mechanism and, after such modification, some owners cut off the bail leaving only an inch or two fastened to the = fork to act as a stop for the flat side of the axle bushing.  Others, = like myself, left the bail in place out of = nostalgia.

 

=

The self centering function = is not an absolute necessity as long as one takes of fairly straight and the = shimmy dampener is working so that the wheel could be jammed into the = well.

 

=

Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, = IL (KARR)

 

=

In a message dated 7/10/2009 = 6:50:42 A.M. Central Daylight Time, jimauman@comcast.net = writes:



-----Original Message-----
From: troneill@charter.net [mailto:troneill@charter.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 10:16 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: New nose strut

Hi Grayhawk,
Snip>
Terrance Wrote:
"The strut does not center- lock when the shaft is fully = extended."

The Strut is supposed to be centered when fully extended. If it is not = or is
not able it is wrong, and unsafe in the retraction cycle.  Not what = it was
designed to do.  Take the strut off and, or get it to someone = willing to
verify its internal integrity.  Something else is terribly wrong. = Has
Lancair gone through your strut?

My strut has been trouble free. (4 years and 200 hours in my = care.)  I have
had tire pressures at 30-35 psi and not a hint of imbalance or shimmy on = the
CHEN SHIN/ ESCO combination.

Jim Auman


Snip>



Terrence O'Neill aka Redhand
L235/320 N211AL
Still grappling with the fuel slowscan 201B, but am cleared to fly 40 = hrs
etc. in my test area.


---- Sky2high@aol.com wrote:
> I don't think ESCO went out of business, maybe just the business = of 
> experimental aircraft struts....
> 
> _http://www.escocorp.com/locations.html_
> (http://www.escocorp.com/locations.html)
> 
> Grayhawk
> 
> 
> In a message dated 7/6/2009 7:46:17 P.M. Central Daylight = Time, 
> cfi@instructor.net writes:
>
> It's my  understanding that ESCO went out of business.
>
>


--
For archives and unsub = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

 

=

 

=

Looking for love this summer? Find it = now on AOL Personals.

------=_NextPart_000_0048_01CA0272.04C66A80--