X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:09:52 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.12.143.99] (HELO imo-m11.mail.aol.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3743045 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:02:43 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.143.99; envelope-from=RWolf99@aol.com Received: from imo-da03.mx.aol.com (imo-da03.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.201]) by imo-m11.mail.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id RELAYIN3-44a4d123189; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:01:53 -0400 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-da03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v40_r1.5.) id q.d5a.4a3963d4 (37119) for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 16:01:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtprly-da01.mx.aol.com (smtprly-da01.mx.aol.com [205.188.249.144]) by cia-ma01.mx.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMA015-5bb14a4d123111f; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:01:56 -0400 Received: from WEBMAIL-DG13 (webmail-dg13.sim.aol.com [205.188.171.77]) by smtprly-da01.mx.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYDA018-5bb14a4d123111f; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:01:53 -0400 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: Diplomacy and Tact X-Original-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:01:53 -0400 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-AOL-IP: 205.188.169.201 X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: rwolf99@aol.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CBC9671428767A_10A4_27AE_WEBMAIL-DG13.sim.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 43661-STANDARD Received: from 72.19.171.41 by WEBMAIL-DG13.sim.aol.com (205.188.171.77) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Thu, 02 Jul 2009 16:01:53 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CBC9671426141F-10A4-135D@WEBMAIL-DG13.sim.aol.com> X-Spam-Flag:NO ----------MB_8CBC9671428767A_10A4_27AE_WEBMAIL-DG13.sim.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Okay, I got what I was looking for -- an open discussion of what might be done when observing dangerous construction practices by others.? I'm not sure what more there is to say on the issue other than I appreciate the comments and the diversity of opinion. As for myself, my attitude is "if you see something I'm doing wrong, please tell me."? I?have fairly thick skin, but that doesn't mean I want it smacking into the ground at 200 knots... - Rob Wolf ----------MB_8CBC9671428767A_10A4_27AE_WEBMAIL-DG13.sim.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Okay, I got what I was looking for -- an open discussion of what might be done when observing dangerous construction practices by others.  I'm not sure what more there is to say on the issue other than I appreciate the comments and the diversity of opinion.

As for myself, my attitude is "if you see something I'm doing wrong, please tell me."  I have fairly thick skin, but that doesn't mean I want it smacking into the ground at 200 knots...

- Rob Wolf ----------MB_8CBC9671428767A_10A4_27AE_WEBMAIL-DG13.sim.aol.com--