Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #51530
From: William Wilson <fluffysheap@gmail.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: flameout at FL220
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 14:58:32 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
This was a big topic of discussion on the rotary-aviation list recently.

100LL does not carry water.  That is why you can drain water out of your tank.  But it can take a few hours for the water to settle to the bottom of the tank, so the fact that you drained it doesn' t mean the amount of water in the tank is zero (and if you didn't drain it then all bets off).  And it's theoretically possible to get some water in places where the drain won't get it out, like in between the tank and the engine.  Bends in the fuel system can trap water, like bends in the plumbing under the sink can trap hair.

On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Colyn Case at earthlink <colyncase@earthlink.net> wrote:
I'm highly skeptical that there is a need for Prist in piston airplanes if you thoroughly test your fuel sumps.
The website is here:
http://www.pristaerospace.com/index.html

Even they don't make a case for using Prist with 100LL.
This suggests that 100LL doesn't carry water in suspension the way that Jet-A does.

Does anyone have more information about 100LL vs. Prist?

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Gray" <Bruce@Glasair.org>
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 8:38 PM

Subject: [LML] Re: flameout at FL220


Prist.

Bruce
www.Glasair.org



--

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster