X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:39:28 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-3647503@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <colyncase@earthlink.net>
Received: from elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.66] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14)
  with ESMTP id 3646711 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 19 May 2009 08:08:00 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.66; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net;
  b=T4HFPxcYOflZrk7J5dJudlMOpYuqLctkenNVzyjuTcXvR1aabwwWRLtr6I6CjUoF;
  h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [216.57.118.63] (helo=ccaselt3)
	by elasmtp-spurfowl.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <colyncase@earthlink.net>)
	id 1M6O6P-0008B6-4b
	for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 19 May 2009 08:07:25 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID: <01f701c9d87a$5f79fe50$6501a8c0@nvidia.com>
From: "Colyn Case at earthlink" <colyncase@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-3646368@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: flameout at FL220
X-Original-Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 08:07:24 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da9403e6fc0c2959f97f51d26f10ebbd0ad57350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 216.57.118.63

I'm highly skeptical that there is a need for Prist in piston airplanes if 
you thoroughly test your fuel sumps.
The website is here:
http://www.pristaerospace.com/index.html

Even they don't make a case for using Prist with 100LL.
This suggests that 100LL doesn't carry water in suspension the way that 
Jet-A does.

Does anyone have more information about 100LL vs. Prist?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bruce Gray" <Bruce@Glasair.org>
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 8:38 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: flameout at FL220


> Prist.
>
> Bruce
> www.Glasair.org
>