X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 20:59:09 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web83915.mail.sp1.yahoo.com ([69.147.92.125] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with SMTP id 3631317 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 04 May 2009 09:38:54 -0400 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=69.147.92.125; envelope-from=paulhershorin@bellsouth.net Received: (qmail 93451 invoked by uid 60001); 4 May 2009 13:38:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=bellsouth.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Mrp56rwnDrbXo7dfWnMk8ARRU69IEHj5YKQXVp4AI3vfB8XIelNnrBNOAWDzNIO331YMQlMjfrLJmh+H3Yj3AGvq+YxA75n3YeezyhRWICoS1Do+B/veRBVWo9OoXCNDYR/wcP7LPgC+m9IXfKaDRrfKkh3AE1TDBfwPdIY8Wj0=; X-Original-Message-ID: <200922.93378.qm@web83915.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: mks_PYoVM1kbjL2wiNnEv98RwOVinHbPzdOXx_3CZ8y3LKHVSq27rCf43q9S.wNNqfiP_fFMwmVnFkjF09bpCDmtD62E7js7tbr29x2pe_IkXaIL.e_ZG.OaUPPuvDosXLi_riEFM9XaKXZ..bGiUyw062ZEihEPtNR0FariBa7_oaIbzo6Y8ev2sj2HeYiv3ED9AcHUBPJh0YCIR.dU6dn5krDgRG7iN_PBCgIu6OW73fFb.AR1H5E7.AghZhr6nRcjjadyPZmVMkzBk2x7Did0Xb7B1luCl1THTR9NPk3IBBL4ekGxRwVPwaxAAAREZwI8w.u1TTYTNfUNzln61dITlW1.uig- Received: from [98.77.136.91] by web83915.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 04 May 2009 06:38:19 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1277.35 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1 References: X-Original-Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT) From: PAUL HERSHORIN Subject: Re: [LML] gross weight for LNC2 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-2021081853-1241444299=:93378" --0-2021081853-1241444299=:93378 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I believe that the Pilot Handbook states gross weight of 1800--=0A=0AHoweve= r, on trips I am at 1900-1950 and see very little change in =0Aperformance = and control. =0APaul Hershorin=0A360=A0 471LA=0A=0A=0A_____________________= ___________=0AFrom: Keith Smith =0ATo: lml@lancairon= line.net=0ASent: Monday, May 4, 2009 8:55:52 AM=0ASubject: [LML] gross weig= ht for LNC2=0A=0ASpeaking with a few owners, most of them have operated in = the 1800-1900lb range, at least out of airports where runway length was not= a factor.=A0 =0A=0AIf I understand correctly, the published figure is 1685= lbs. I'm curious how that number was derived, and what I should be on the l= ookout for when exceeding that weight.=0A=0AI know that when I took my firs= t demo ride 2 weeks ago, we were around 1750lbs, and climbing out at 1500fp= m on what was pretty close to a standard day.=0A=0AWhat maximum figure woul= d you use for a 360? --0-2021081853-1241444299=:93378 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I believe that the Pilot Handbook states gross weight of 1800--
=0A
However, on trips I am at 1900-1950 and see very little change in=
=0A
performance and control.
=0A
Paul Hershorin
=0A
360  4= 71LA
=0A
=0A
=0A= From: Keith Smith <keith= .smith@gmail.com>
To:= lml@lancaironline.net
Sent:= Monday, May 4, 2009 8:55:52 AM
Subject: [LML] gross weight for LNC2

Speaking wit= h a few owners, most of them have operated in the 1800-1900lb range, at lea= st out of airports where runway length was not a factor. 

If I= understand correctly, the published figure is 1685lbs. I'm curious how tha= t number was derived, and what I should be on the lookout for when exceedin= g that weight.

I know that when I took my first demo ride 2 weeks ag= o, we were around 1750lbs, and climbing out at 1500fpm on what was pretty c= lose to a standard day.

What maximum figure would you use for a 360?=


--0-2021081853-1241444299=:93378--