X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 20:08:34 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web62506.mail.re1.yahoo.com ([69.147.75.98] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with SMTP id 3630753 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 03 May 2009 17:42:05 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=69.147.75.98; envelope-from=charliekohler@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 94579 invoked by uid 60001); 3 May 2009 21:41:29 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=V6MR7IpJDT2l9yEm0Ek9UpMncUlXe2l8be7jKFJBxbJYgSMBr96/0k32nI1rSUCjiGLOD6e2FZ4YzTmEzB2aLO1OI2MQv54pacUpfkVpURZdtJ4vXQ98xiydywUieeXQrU2a9uAOrNI7X5Kx1C1f9zU6KAtyNCa+K4I43QsF7hA=; X-Original-Message-ID: <400490.93401.qm@web62506.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: VRWebYcVM1kUv57I9p3vWaucSd3KHdNr6O5Vokt6H9Qe0zh1Tm5pxZ73k6Fk8ZziJMgZ0nQHxNTvniBvPy0AxiIhT3h9ai4_VwmQAuFf3U5Vr3LeIFR6dczeaCuol2KImBY5IW9oTEL72lVAT0eZJ8iFXbFsKfEcrOyQMnepy3jhjzlNErgc7EKYuDWu545tbjZRhXKg_pasPiPHsP.f__l5GaUU2kTpqNzYolqnTYA9KMajae1JPTSjPS9hEDh25rfTclf3W7nOihyRKbeG5adupNh_NflOaDQA5D10SwZNxHru5NEsUqPl0qg4LZyWfg-- Received: from [97.104.160.94] by web62506.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 03 May 2009 14:41:29 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1277.35 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.1 References: X-Original-Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 14:41:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Charlie Kohler Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Lancair Flight Safety X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1871420294-1241386889=:93401" --0-1871420294-1241386889=:93401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable YES --=0AI sure would like to have the link to get=A0a copy of this informa= tion.=0AThanks,=A0=0A=A0=0ACharlie K.=0A=0ASee me on the web at =0Awww.Lanc= air-IV.com=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A________________________________=0AFrom: Colyn = Case at earthlink =0ATo: lml@lancaironline.net=0AS= ent: Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:00:52 PM=0ASubject: [LML] Re: Lancair Flight Saf= ety=0A=0A=0AGary, thanks for forwarding this.=0AI wouldn't mind having a hi= gher res copy of the first page.=A0 the table is hard to read.=0A=A0=0AAnyw= ay, 16% of the fatals vs. 3.2% of the fleet.=A0=A0 16/3.2 =3D 5.=A0=A0=A0 d= oesn't that mean lancair insurance should be 5x more expensive than that of= average amateur builts? --0-1871420294-1241386889=:93401 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=0A
YES --
=0A
I sure would like to have the l= ink to get a copy of this information.
=0A
Thanks, 
&= nbsp;
=0A
Charlie K.
=0A
 
=0A
See me on th= e web at
=0A=0A
 
=0A
<= BR>
=0A

=0A
=0A
= =0AFrom: Colyn Case at eart= hlink <colyncase@earthlink.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2009 5:00:52 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: Lancair Flight Safety

=0A=0A=0A
Gary, thanks for f= orwarding this.
=0A
I wouldn't mind havi= ng a higher res copy of the first page.  the table is hard to read.
=0A
 
=0A
Anyway, 16% of the fatals vs. 3.2% of the fleet.   16/3.= 2 =3D 5.    doesn't that mean lancair insurance should be 5x= more expensive than that of average amateur builts?
--0-1871420294-1241386889=:93401--