X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 17:00:52 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.14) with ESMTP id 3630011 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 02 May 2009 12:47:50 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.69; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=UFcvVUH36Zz//4ltuBx9D7xhKLkvRtIVjRKum92J5ia2hv2P1IhBtbN08CxjypAj; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [216.57.118.63] (helo=ccaselt3) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1M0IMs-0002HO-K8 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 02 May 2009 12:47:14 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <091b01c9cb45$a6d245b0$6801a8c0@nvidia.com> From: "Colyn Case at earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Lancair Flight Safety X-Original-Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:47:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0918_01C9CB24.1F19B750" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da940133229f5bd789f82f8a632ee7f78a9a0350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 216.57.118.63 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0918_01C9CB24.1F19B750 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gary, thanks for forwarding this. I wouldn't mind having a higher res copy of the first page. the table = is hard to read. Anyway, 16% of the fatals vs. 3.2% of the fleet. 16/3.2 =3D 5. = doesn't that mean lancair insurance should be 5x more expensive than = that of average amateur builts? ------=_NextPart_000_0918_01C9CB24.1F19B750 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Gary, thanks for forwarding this.
I wouldn't mind having a higher res copy of the = first=20 page.  the table is hard to read.
 
Anyway, 16% of the fatals vs. 3.2% of the=20 fleet.   16/3.2 =3D 5.    doesn't that mean = lancair=20 insurance should be 5x more expensive than that of average amateur=20 builts?
------=_NextPart_000_0918_01C9CB24.1F19B750--