X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:43:28 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web81101.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.199.93] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.8) with SMTP id 3206631 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:43:11 -0400 Received: (qmail 83122 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Oct 2008 20:43:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=rM2xm/Ts5uHMQPSNShCx3Og6nvDcp6FawpFtnqz1qp/DnKszhxnbT4DYYgz674X1IZ/VPf0YA5VVPIZEW2Vo4L3DgjIi96ryOcu2KmRiNXwappNlWFx7K94Cs8LgM7en33qLCKxvDckwi5oe5INOXMMpqEnuHQLw9674l7fGLKc=; X-YMail-OSG: oEJVPoMVM1laRYf99FEGSnjsO2PnQYqLJGX8HOYRWsVWrp8mCFhFo6a2YlrFiqiEfiXmIlnsnszWmvrA041Nx7w2j8xTGGTnKjG_ihwm2YEl9qsXB6EQUJxCpezqJ5n961Ks7fN1Nz8n.dIWghHIq0gJwTr3j4KON8LiBx5twMdcM_b6hF_GwDseTPk- Received: from [74.173.94.252] by web81101.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:43:11 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.218.2 X-Original-Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 13:43:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Susan Brunner Reply-To: n98pb@sbcglobal.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Oil Drain Sumps for the Continental engine X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-292485615-1223584991=:82493" X-Original-Message-ID: <396971.82493.qm@web81101.mail.mud.yahoo.com> --0-292485615-1223584991=:82493 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Had one on my IVP and found after many hours that there was some conflict w= ith the gear assembly when retracted and a small wear pattern was noticed.= =A0 I am staying with the pan plug, rather safe than sorry. Pat Brunner --- On Thu, 10/9/08, Robert Pastusek wrote: From: Robert Pastusek Subject: [LML] Re: Oil Drain Sumps for the Continental engine To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008, 6:47 AM John Hafen wrote: Is there any reason I would NOT want to use [a quick drai= n] on the Lancair Continental? =A0=A0Have any of you had experience with th= ese suckers, good or bad, on the Lancair? I have a quick drain (different manufacturer, but same concept) installed o= n my IV-P, and love it so far. (only about 130 flight hours/four oil change= s to date) It has all the benefits you describe, and my engine is clean and= dry to this point. =A0 We tried to install one on the =93twin=94 to my airplane but even the very = low profile unit was too close to the nose gear strut when retracted. This = being a pretty critical item, we went back to the regular plug. As a result= of this experience, I had Ron Monson at Performance Engines install a drai= n plug on the side of the oil pan where it is well clear of the nose gear l= inkage. This has been a good solution with no adverse effects I can determi= ne.=20 =A0 I recommend you very carefully check the clearances with the gear linkage w= hen you install one of these. With that consideration, I think they are a g= reat addition to the airplane. Bob --0-292485615-1223584991=:82493 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Had one on my IVP and found after many h= ours that there was some conflict with the gear assembly when retracted and= a small wear pattern was noticed.  I am staying with the pan plug, ra= ther safe than sorry.
Pat Brunner

--- On Thu, 10/9/08, Robert Pastusek <rpas= tusek@htii.com> wrote:
From: Robert Pastusek <rpastusek@htii.com>
S= ubject: [LML] Re: Oil Drain Sumps for the Continental engine
To: lml@lan= caironline.net
Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008, 6:47 AM

John Hafen wrote: Is there any reason I w= ould NOT want to use [a quick drain] = on the Lancair Continental?   Have any of you had experience with= these suckers, good or bad, on the Lancair?

I have a quick drain (different manufacture= r, but same concept) installed on my IV-P, and love it so far. (only about = 130 flight hours/four oil changes to date) It has all the benefits you desc= ribe, and my engine is clean and dry to this point.

 

We tried to install one on the =93twin=94 t= o my airplane but even the very low profile unit was too close to the nose = gear strut when retracted. This being a pretty critical item, we went back = to the regular plug. As a result of this experience, I had Ron Monson at Pe= rformance Engines install a drain plug on the side of the oil pan where it = is well clear of the nose gear linkage. This has been a good solution with = no adverse effects I can determine.

 

I recommend you very carefully check the cl= earances with the gear linkage when you install one of these. With that con= sideration, I think they are a great addition to the airplane.


Bob

--0-292485615-1223584991=:82493--