X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:29:09 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.68] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.8) with ESMTP id 3201836 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:05:38 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.68; envelope-from=panelmaker@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=kieObQVeFjdNDtJy8zCXVGNvrMAruLv0rq1UOm9HuJmY9A81J2ArmDBImJ751C/v; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Thread-Index:X-MimeOLE:Message-ID:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [209.173.71.217] (helo=DELL8300) by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KmvOC-0005lP-Jq for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:05:04 -0400 From: "Jim Nordin" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: Small Tail Incidence Data X-Original-Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:05:08 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0083_01C927BC.8AA95D60" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcknuI4zraGhQilqTOWXD1/To6dxxwABkfuA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 X-Original-Message-ID: X-ELNK-Trace: bdfc62829fd2a80cc8ad50643b1069f8239a348a220c260979a69c0fec9cd6f02208432d85deb1af548b785378294e88350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 209.173.71.217 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0083_01C927BC.8AA95D60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Scott, I didn=92t think that would work (having the elevator on) until I = did the same measurements and calculation. I first did mine without the = elevator attached, dividing the cord thickness in half then measuring the = waterline to leading edge. I got -.82=BA to -.95=BA depending on how well you can interpret the meniscus. So I measured with the elevator on and got = -.59=BA to -.67=BA. Close enough. =20 I guess this means that my elevator has a slight downward deflection = from the fixed portion. My dimensions were 21.25 at 12 inches in from the counter balance cut. = The waterline difference was .25 inch to .22 inches depending on how well = you read the meniscus. I=92m glad I did this re-measurement as the longer I thought about it = the more convinced I was I did it wrong when I set the HS. Jim =20 _____ =20 From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Sky2high@aol.com Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 8:35 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Small Tail Incidence Data =20 Here are the results:=20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0083_01C927BC.8AA95D60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Scott, I didn=92t think that would = work (having the elevator on) until I did the same measurements and = calculation. I first did mine without the elevator attached, dividing the cord = thickness in half then measuring the waterline to leading edge. I got -.82=BA to = -.95=BA depending on how well you can interpret the meniscus. So I measured with the = elevator on and got -.59=BA =A0to -.67=BA. Close enough.

 

I guess this means that my elevator = has a slight downward deflection from the fixed portion.

My dimensions were 21.25 at 12 = inches in from the counter balance cut. The waterline difference was .25 inch to = .22 inches depending on how well you read the meniscus.

I=92m glad I did this re-measurement = as the longer I thought about it the more convinced I was I did it wrong when I = set the HS.

Jim

 

From: = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Sky2high@aol.com
Sent: Monday, October 06, = 2008 8:35 AM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Small Tail Incidence Data

 

 Here are the results: =

 

------=_NextPart_000_0083_01C927BC.8AA95D60--