X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 12:10:35 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-3188205@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <blackoaks@gmail.com>
Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.191] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.8)
  with ESMTP id 3186557 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:45:17 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.134.191; envelope-from=blackoaks@gmail.com
Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i10so377043mue.7
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version
         :content-type:references;
        b=azPVG1GOlMze1E2FzqGCfPLgQa79XVT22CE/Grfj6r0G+TgLjz5Gfbi3+lnPTXPs1Y
         6rwhX+2bgEN45y7A0INGXPR8oA9NPFnw0jULV8VE+nl4zVJeUCWpX3c/V0+RLzC6YW9j
         JEkxn/lZu7plErMW1bvRfH1lQhnBibJ9CsSsE=
Received: by 10.180.239.7 with SMTP id m7mr5291736bkh.87.1222353879003;
        Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:44:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.218.11 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:44:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-Message-ID: <254321ea0809250744o638490fbxc3d564706885e94c@mail.gmail.com>
X-Original-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 07:44:38 -0700
From: "John McMahon" <blackoaks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: SkyCatcher flat spins and crashes......
In-Reply-To: <list-3186124@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_3680_14150430.1222353879003"
References: <list-3186124@logan.com>

------=_Part_3680_14150430.1222353879003
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

One of the reports I read mentioned there was a failure of the ballistic
chute before he bailed out.  It may be that they were depending on it if a
problem developed rather than instlling a traditional spin recovery chute.

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 8:32 PM, J H Webb <airmale4@yahoo.com> wrote:

> What surprises me is that there is no mention of a spin chute.
>

------=_Part_3680_14150430.1222353879003
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<div dir="ltr">One of the reports I read mentioned there was a failure of the
ballistic chute before he bailed out.&nbsp; It may be that they were
depending on it if a problem developed rather than instlling a
traditional spin recovery chute.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 8:32 PM, J H Webb <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:airmale4@yahoo.com">airmale4@yahoo.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div style="font-family: tahoma,new york,times,serif; font-size: 14pt;"><p>What surprises me is that there is no mention of a spin chute. </p></div></div></blockquote></div><br>
</div>

------=_Part_3680_14150430.1222353879003--